Bug#1057171: libitext5-java: FTBFS with bouncycastle 1.77

Hi, I tried the latest upstream version of libitext5-java and commited the change to Git. Unfortunately the problem persists. Some Debian Med packages are depending from this package so I'd be happy if someone could have a look. You can find the latest log in Salsa CI[1]. Kind regards Andre

Bug#1033366: resteasy3.0: should migrate to tomcat10

Am Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 03:02:10PM +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Am Freitag, dem 21.04.2023 um 14:50 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > > Ahhh, right, the repository went over to source package resteasy.  So > > well, the CI log is not helpful for this bug log.  What I ra

Bug#1033366: resteasy3.0: should migrate to tomcat10

Hi Markus, Am Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:39:17PM +0200 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Am Freitag, dem 21.04.2023 um 12:23 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > I tried to rebuild this package which does not work as you can > > see in Salsa CI: > > > >     https://salsa.debian.or

Bug#1033366: resteasy3.0: should migrate to tomcat10

Hi, I tried to rebuild this package which does not work as you can see in Salsa CI: https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/resteasy/-/jobs/4105287 Unfortunately I have no idea how to fix this. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java

Bug#973135: Bug#973070: libsis-base-java: FTBFS: Could not delete the directory targets/unit-test-wd/ch.syst

Hi, here is a suggested patch for commons-io that would prevent making the test in libsis-base-java fail. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Bernd Rinn - Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:40:29 +0100 From: Bernd Rinn To: Andreas Tille CC: 973...@bugs.debian.org Subject

Re: checker-framework-java_3.0.1+ds-1~exp2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I'm busy with real life until next Monday - it would be great if somebody could care for this soon since bazel depends on it. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu Oct 22 02:00:09 BST 2020 Sean Whitton ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org wrote: > +--+ > | REJECT reasonin

Bug#957190: [Help] f2j: ftbfs with GCC-10

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:53:24AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Try the attached patch. Thanks, this works Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please u

Bug#957190: [Help] f2j: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tags -1 help Hi, I think I've fixed part of the problem in Git[1]. Unfortunately there is a remainig "multiple definition" issue where I have no idea how to fix it: ex.o f2jmain.o symtab.o codegen.o vcg_emitter.o dlist.o typecheck.o optimize.o globals.o f2jmem.o -L/build/f2j-0.8.1+df

Bug#963396: jimfs: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project jimfs: Compilation failure

Hi Thorsten, On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 04:04:22PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > [ERROR] > > /build/jimfs-1.1/jimfs/src/main/java/com/google/common/jimfs/PathService.java:[290,30] > > error: is not abstract > >

Bug#963396: jimfs: FTBFS: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:compile (default-compile) on project jimfs: Compilation failure

Control: tags -1 help Hi, I was running routine-update on jimfs repository since it seems to lack some love (not even Salsa URLs in VCS-fields) but the build error remains (for sure since I did not changed the code). I've checked upstream[1] which says: 1.1 @cgdecker released this on Feb 1

ITP: google-api-client-java -- Flexible, efficient, and powerful Java client library for accessing any HTTP-based API on the web

Control: tags -1 ITP: google-api-client-java -- Flexible, efficient, and powerful Java client library for accessing any HTTP-based API on the web Control: owner -1 ti...@debian.org I've commited some rough packaging to https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/google-api-client-java The packaging

Bug#956845: freehep-graphicsio: New upstream version available

Source: freehep-graphicsio Severity: normal Hi, as explained in bug #956843 the cdk package can not build with all components since some of these need freehep-graphicsio 2.4. This is available at https://github.com/freehep It would be great if all freehep-* packages would be upgraded to th

Bug#956843: cdk: Please package cdk-depict.jar

Source: cdk Version: 1:2.3-2 Severity: normal Hi, I have read the line debian/libcdk-java.poms:# depict requires freehep-graphicsio-* 2.4 (Debian has older) which explains why cdk-depict.jar is not build. However, as I explain in bug #956841 classes from this are needed by other software.

Bug#923759: Update

Merged and adapted d/changelog. Will be uploaded after buster release. Thanks a lot for your enhancements, Andreas. On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 09:10:40PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.03.19 um 20:59 schrieb Dominik Stadler: > > I think the current changes do not properly fix this, I

Bug#923759: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar)

compile target that seems to be "hidden" in nbproject/build-impl.xml not executed any more and how can I get back the status of 0.9.3-3 which was building nicely? I seriously need help on this matter. Kind regards Andreas. On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 01:55:46PM +0100, Andreas T

Bug#923330: jajuk: Fails to start with Java Runtime Environment 1.7 minimum required. You use a JVM ext.JVM@23fc625e

Hi Markus, you have set this bug pending but the fix seems not to be uploaded until now. The package would have been removed from testing without my ping of the bug (which is the only thing I intend to do here. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer addr

Bug#923759: One step ahead but compile errors (Was: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar)

Hi, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58:33AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I realised that > > /usr/share/java/netlib-java-0.9.3.jar > > is nearly empty, specifically > > /org/netlib/arpack > /org/netlib/blas > /org/netlib/lapack > > do not con

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote: > > >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. May be that's sensible for Buster+1 > > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will > > be remov

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about > this? In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. Kind regards A

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

Hi, Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about this? Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912549#10 -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#923759: netlib-java contains nealy empty jar (Was: mtj: FTBFS in buster/sid)

ot really want to package the new versions * debhelper 12 * Point Vcs fields to salsa.debian.org * Standards-Version: 4.3.0 * Secure URI in copyright format -- Andreas Tille Sun, 13 Jan 2019 21:11:05 +0100 and the previous version on snapshots[1] contains a proper jar file with all classes

Bug#919064: scala FTBFS: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/tonicsystems/jarjar/asm/commons/ModuleHashesAttribute

Hi Java team, I realised that there is no comment on this bug yet. Since several of my packages got a "removal from testing warning": Can I help somehow? Not that I had the slightest idea what to do about this bug but may be you have some idea I could test? I've seen that there is a new upstream

Bug#910041: Would you mind uploading the fix / workaround

Hi Stuart, some of the Debian Med packages (and probably more) are affected by this bug and got a "removal from testing warning". What about uploading the fix / workaround you prepared in Git? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's

Bug#910041: aether-ant-tasks FTBFS: error: Can't rename /usr/share/java/commons-lang3.jar as /usr/share/java/commons-lang3.zbk Permission denied

Hi Emmanuel, since several Debian Med package depend from aether-ant-tasks I had a look whether I can help. I started with some polishing in Git (set Vcs fields, Standards-Version, debhelper, cme) but for the real problem I can only confirm that I can reproduce the issue. However, since the pack

Re: Bug#907559: cgview: Does not start

29, 2018 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Package: cgview > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi, > > cgview in sid/testing does not start while the same code base in stable > works perfectly. It just dies with: > > $ cgview

Bug#906375: Tried new upstream version

Hi, On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 01:22:21AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > [ERROR] The project com.itextpdf:itextpdf:5.5.13 > > (/build/libitext5-java-5.5.13/itext/pom.xml) has 1 error > > [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM for com.itextpdf:itextpdf:5.5.13: > > Cannot access central (https://r

Bug#906375: Tried new upstream version

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 04:48:05PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Do you get the same build failure with the new version? No, it is different: ... [INFO] Scanning for projects... [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs: [FATAL] Non-resolvable parent POM for com

Bug#906375: Tried new upstream version

Hi, I realised that there is a new upstream version, fixed the watch file in Git and tried to build the package. Unfortunately the build fails as well. I commited my attempt anyway and hope this small contribution will help fixing the issue some more skilled Java developer than me. Kind regards

Bug#873341: Any news for this issue?

Hi again, On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:51:09PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > You undeniably have the best understanding of SBT among the Debian > developers. Even if you don't have the time to tackle all of this by > yourself, do you think you could sketch a plan we could follow to > achieve the

Bug#873341: Sbt packaging (Was: Bug#873341: Any news for this issue?)

g is quite slow currently. It would be better to fix the issues - and if you be a bit more verbose what exactly is not policy compliant I'd colunteer to have a look. Kind regards Andreas. > On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:33:05 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > >

Bug#900124: ITP: libjavolution-java -- Java core library for real-time and embedded systems

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille * Package name: libjavolution-java Version : 6.0.0 Upstream Author : Javolution * URL : http://javolution.org/ * License : BSD-2-clause Programming Lang: Java Description : Java core library for

Bug#873341: Any news for this issue?

Hi, I once libscala-pickling-java and I wonder whether I could provide any help. I'd love to finalise the project that made me stumbling about sbt last year. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#893268: libjbzip2-java now in Java team, libnanoxml2-java remains buggy (Was: Bug#893268: Intend to take over libjbzip2-java and libnanoxml2-java into Debian Med team)

Hi, On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 01:59:42AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > You summoned? > > Thank you for the quick help! It works perfectly. > > @Andreas: I pushed the fixes, could you complete the upload please? Done. BTW, I did the team hijack to enable every team member to upload. While its

Bug#893268: libjbzip2-java now in Java team, libnanoxml2-java remains buggy (Was: Bug#893268: Intend to take over libjbzip2-java and libnanoxml2-java into Debian Med team)

/libnanoxml2-java On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:59:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 25/03/2018 à 23:29, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > I'm fine with moving libjbzip2-java (which I uploaded today) once > > pkg-java has moved to Salsa (or did I missed the move?) > > I&

Bug#893268: Intend to take over libjbzip2-java and libnanoxml2-java into Debian Med team

Hi, On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:59:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I'm fine with moving libjbzip2-java (which I uploaded today) once > > pkg-java has moved to Salsa (or did I missed the move?) > > I'm working on the migration, I haven't finalized the notification hooks > yet. Besides the ge