Bug#1037037: RFP: eu-dss -- EU Digital Signature Service implementation

2023-06-02 Thread Andrej Shadura
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Java Maintainers , team+ei...@tracker.debian.org * Package name: eu-dss (?) Version : 5.12 Upstream Contact: David Naramski, Pierrick Vandenbroucke, Aleksandr Beliakov et al * URL : https://github.com/esig/dss

Bug#925533: libspring-java: stopped building libspring-jms-java and libspring-messaging-java

2019-03-27 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:27:38 +0100 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:> I think this was done to remove the openhft packages that are > incompatible with Java 11. But maybe the affected Spring modules could > be salvaged by disabling the code using openhft (if it's optional). I’m not entirely sure it is

Bug#925533: libspring-java: stopped building libspring-jms-java and libspring-messaging-java

2019-03-27 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:35:41 -0700 tony mancill wrote: > Regarding the OpenHFT, I tried to help the overall situation by > uploading new versions to experimental several months back but as was > discussed on the list (I'd have to find the link), was requested to > hold-off on transitioning them

Bug#925533: libspring-java: stopped building libspring-jms-java and libspring-messaging-java

2019-03-27 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:01:40 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:35:41PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > Are you sure about the upload of 4.3.22-2 changing the number of binary > > packages built? If that is the case, it was completely unintentional. > > Meh, apparently

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

2019-03-10 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 18:14, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > Hello Andrej, > > bug 923748 is about a different issue and unrelated to your recent upload. > We need to fix it too and I proposed a patch here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756#30 Sorry

Re: Accepted javatools 0.72.3 (source) into unstable

2019-03-10 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 16:39, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Hello Andrej and Java Maintainers. > > It is possible/likely that this upload has just broken src:png-sixlegs? > > This package built ok seven hours ago: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=png%2dsixlegs > > but not anymore: >

Bug#887666: jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N

2019-03-10 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:45:03 +0200 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 07/04/2018 à 19:55, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > I have written some patches to rewrite most of the javatools helpers > > into perl using Debhelper's Dh_Lib[1]. This would fix this problem and > > avoid future instances of it. > >

RM: openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-1

2019-03-09 Thread Andrej Shadura
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 release.debian.org Control: tags -2 = buster Control: retitle -2 RM: RM: openhft-chronicle-threads/1.1.6-1 On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:33:17 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: openhft-chronicle-threads > Version: 1.1.6-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs

RM: openhft-chronicle-wire/1.1.13-1

2019-03-09 Thread Andrej Shadura
Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 release.debian.org Control: tags -2 = buster Control: retitle -2 RM: openhft-chronicle-wire/1.1.13-1 Please remove openhft-chronicle-wire from testing, I don’t see any chance of us properly solving this for Buster. -- Cheers, Andrej __ This is the

Re: libspring-java_4.3.23~git20190308-1_multi.changes REJECTED

2019-03-09 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 at 13:04, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > libspring-java_4.3.23~git20190308-1_multi.changes: binary upload requires > Binary field I have reuploaded as a source-only upload, but I don’t have any idea what this means. -- Cheers, Andrej __ This is the maintainer address of

Bug#917702: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9

2019-02-26 Thread Andrej Shadura
Hi, On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 15:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 26/02/2019 à 15:05, Markus Koschany a écrit : > > The FTBFS bug got fixed yesterday. I should complain more often. Andrej > > uploaded version 9.1.17 to unstable. This is not the latest one but I > > guess better than nothing? The

Bug#917702: Accepted jruby 9.1.17.0-1 (source) into unstable

2019-02-25 Thread Andrej Shadura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:38:40 +0100 Source: jruby Binary: jruby Architecture: source Version: 9.1.17.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Description: jruby

Bug#923295: src:jruby-joni: tests fail with invalid character property name

2019-02-25 Thread Andrej Shadura
Package: src:jruby-joni Version: 2.1.25-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream ftbfs Forwarded: https://github.com/jruby/joni/issues/40 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, As you already know, jruby-joni fails build-time tests in the current unstable: SEVERE ERROR:

Re: dictzip-java_0.8.2-1_multi.changes REJECTED

2019-01-14 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 21:10, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > > Hi Andrej, > > according to README.md the license of dictzip-cli is GPL3+. > Please add this to your debian/copyright. However, in the files themselves it says GPL-2+, that’s why I’ve put that into d/copyright. But okay, I’ll change it

Bug#911093: libjetbrains-annotations-java: missing Breaks+Replaces: libintellij-annotations-java (<< 16.0.2-4)

2018-10-25 Thread Andrej Shadura
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 14:12, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:48:38 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Package: libjetbrains-annotations-java > > Version: 16.0.2-4 > > Severity: serious > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks > > > >

Bug#909409: libintellij-annotations-java: incorrect package name, rdepends are failing to find JARs

2018-09-23 Thread Andrej Shadura
Package: libintellij-annotations-java Version: 16.0.2-1 Severity: grave The latest upstream version renamed the package internally (com.intellij.annotations → org.jetbrains.annotations) leading to e.g.: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve dependencies for