On Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:24:37 -0700 tony mancill wrote:
> For JDK 11, I believe we want https://github.com/openjdk/jfx11u
> For JDK 17, it would be https://github.com/openjdk/jfx17u
>
> Agreed. Java Team, should we be targeting OpenJFX 17 for bookworm, or
> is an updated build of OpenJFX 11
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Your package failed to build from source on arm64 and armhf while it
> > built there successfully in the past.
>
> I just checked to see if there would be a
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Your package failed to build from
source on arm64 and armhf while it built there successfully in the past.
I just checked to see if there would be a commit upstream to fix the
FTBFS, but it seems that upstream is active and is at
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.11+0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 11.0.11+1-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60
