Le 03/09/2018 à 17:29, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Just updating libequinox-osgi-java would have been
> a straightforward solution.
I agree this is mostly a change in the name of the binary package. I
could have kept the libequinox-osgi-java name with some contortions and
avoid updating the
Am 03.09.2018 um 15:38 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Le 03/09/2018 à 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit :
>
>> I think this could have been better communicated. I was the one who
>> split libequinox-osgi-java off from Eclipse. Why can't we just use the
>> existing package and update it
Hi Markus,
Le 03/09/2018 à 14:48, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> I think this could have been better communicated. I was the one who
> split libequinox-osgi-java off from Eclipse. Why can't we just use the
> existing package and update it accordingly? In any case giving a reason
> for a package
Hi,
Am 03.09.2018 um 14:04 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Control: reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
> Control: affects -1 libequinox-osgi-java
>
> libeclipse-osgi-java will replace libequinox-osgi-java. I forgot to add
> the proper Breaks/Replaces fields.
I think this could have been better
Control: reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
Control: affects -1 libequinox-osgi-java
libeclipse-osgi-java will replace libequinox-osgi-java. I forgot to add
the proper Breaks/Replaces fields.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libeclipse-osgi-java
Bug #907863 [libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java]
libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java' to
Package: libeclipse-osgi-java,libequinox-osgi-java
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 3.12.100+eclipse4.7.3-1
Control: found -1 3.9.1-1
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by
