Bug#978499: #978499: fop: reproducible builds: Support using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for timestamps in PDF files

2021-01-01 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 11:17:46AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2020-12-31, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > fop (1:2.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* Team upload > >* Update SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch (Closes: #978499) > > - Conditionally use SOURCE_DATA_EPOCH in P

Bug#978499: #978499: fop: reproducible builds: Support using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for timestamps in PDF files

2021-01-01 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-12-31, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > fop (1:2.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Team upload >* Update SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH patch (Closes: #978499) > - Conditionally use SOURCE_DATA_EPOCH in PDFInfo, PDFMetadata, >PDFRenderingUtil, and FileIDGenerator classes. >

Bug#978499: #978499: fop: reproducible builds: Support using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for timestamps in PDF files

2020-12-30 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 11:13:48AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Thanks for the quick upload! unfortunately... > > > For example, in xorg-docs: > > > > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/diffoscope-results/xorg-docs.html > > > > /usr/share/doc/xorg-docs

Bug#978499: #978499: fop: reproducible builds: Support using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for timestamps in PDF files

2020-12-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: notfixed 978499 1:2.5-2 On 2020-12-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Several packages use fop to generate PDF files in Debian packages, but > the resulting PDF files have embedding timestamp information in the > CreationDate of the PDF: > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/i