Bug#517035: tomcat6: Default HTTP connector port should not be 8080

2009-03-03 Thread YOSHINO Yoshihito
> Which caching service are you talking about? > Sorry, I was misled by /etc/services about "WWW caching service": > http-alt 8080/tcpwebcache# WWW caching service > http-alt 8080/udp# WWW caching service which does not appear in IANA site (http:/

Bug#518068: libsaxon-java: saxon doesn't use local docbook-xsl files

2009-03-03 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Package: libsaxon-java Version: 1:6.5.5-5 Severity: normal Hi, using saxon to create manpages from docbook files is VERY slow in comparison to xsltproc. Additionally, the results don't match as the locally installed docbook XSL files (package docbook-xsl) do not get used and the current upstream

Bug#517832: jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM

2009-03-03 Thread Guillaume Lasmayous
Marcus Better wrote on 03/03/2009 13:25:33: > > Thanks for reporting. I don't think Tomcat has got a lot of testing on > S/390. Can you try with cacao-oj6-jre as well? > Hi Marcus, I tested with cacao-oj6-jre I got from testing (apt-get -t squeeze cacao-oj6-jre), as it's not available in le

Bug#517832: jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM

2009-03-03 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Guillaume Lasmayous wrote: > Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava tomcat5.5: The java-gcj-compat-dev environment > currently doesn't > Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava tomcat5.5: support a security manager. See > README.Debian. > Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava jsvc.exec[600

Re: libjgrapht-java and contrib

2009-03-03 Thread Steffen Moeller
Hi Daniel, Daniel Leidert wrote: > I'm wondering about the move of libjgrapht-java to contrib. In > README.Debian you say, that it doesn't build with gcj. I now tried to > build the software. > > Version 0.6 builds fine with gcj. Why has it been moved to contrib too? > There is BTW no note in the

Processed: Re: fixed

2009-03-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 451258 Bug#451258: fop: footnote inside varlistentry is not rendered in PDF output Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrato

Bug#451258: fixed

2009-03-03 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
reopen 451258 thanks Le mardi 03 mars 2009 à 09:36 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is > >> great anyway :) ). But it doesn't work with released 0.95 version. > >> I tested with FOP 0.95 from Debia

Bug#451258: fixed

2009-03-03 Thread Michalis Kamburelis
Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is >> great anyway :) ). But it doesn't work with released 0.95 version. >> I tested with FOP 0.95 from Debian unstable packages (1:0.95.dfsg-4), >> then binary 0.95 from upstream, and testcase failed just

Bug#451258: fixed

2009-03-03 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le samedi 28 février 2009 à 12:21 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried your example with fop v0.95 and it is working perfectly for me. > > > > Closing. > > > > I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is > great anywa