> Which caching service are you talking about?
>
Sorry, I was misled by /etc/services about "WWW caching service":
> http-alt 8080/tcpwebcache# WWW caching service
> http-alt 8080/udp# WWW caching service
which does not appear in IANA site
(http:/
Package: libsaxon-java
Version: 1:6.5.5-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
using saxon to create manpages from docbook files is VERY slow in comparison to
xsltproc.
Additionally, the results don't match as the locally installed docbook XSL files
(package docbook-xsl) do not get used and the current upstream
Marcus Better wrote on 03/03/2009 13:25:33:
>
> Thanks for reporting. I don't think Tomcat has got a lot of testing on
> S/390. Can you try with cacao-oj6-jre as well?
>
Hi Marcus,
I tested with cacao-oj6-jre I got from testing (apt-get -t squeeze
cacao-oj6-jre), as it's not available in le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Guillaume Lasmayous wrote:
> Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava tomcat5.5: The java-gcj-compat-dev environment
> currently doesn't
> Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava tomcat5.5: support a security manager. See
> README.Debian.
> Mar 2 09:22:04 debjava jsvc.exec[600
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> I'm wondering about the move of libjgrapht-java to contrib. In
> README.Debian you say, that it doesn't build with gcj. I now tried to
> build the software.
>
> Version 0.6 builds fine with gcj. Why has it been moved to contrib too?
> There is BTW no note in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 451258
Bug#451258: fop: footnote inside varlistentry is not rendered in PDF output
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
reopen 451258
thanks
Le mardi 03 mars 2009 à 09:36 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis a écrit :
> Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >> I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is
> >> great anyway :) ). But it doesn't work with released 0.95 version.
> >> I tested with FOP 0.95 from Debia
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is
>> great anyway :) ). But it doesn't work with released 0.95 version.
>> I tested with FOP 0.95 from Debian unstable packages (1:0.95.dfsg-4),
>> then binary 0.95 from upstream, and testcase failed just
Le samedi 28 février 2009 à 12:21 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis a écrit :
> Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried your example with fop v0.95 and it is working perfectly for me.
> >
> > Closing.
> >
>
> I did some tests, it seems that it works with current trunk (which is
> great anywa
9 matches
Mail list logo