Re: groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:38:20AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Hi Paul, thanks for reviewing this package. > > I already addressed this issue and uploaded a new release. > > Please take a look at groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3 when you have a chance. Sweet, thanks Miguel! Marked for ACCEPT! Thanks

groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-3_amd64.changes is NEW

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:groovy2 is NEW. binary:groovy2-doc is NEW. source:groovy2 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packag

Bug#759635: libspring-java: Please replace dependencies on tomcat6 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:libspring-java Version: 3.0.6.RELEASE-13 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (

Bug#759631: tiles: Please replace dependencies on tomcat6 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:tiles Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in the ne

Bug#759644: mina2: Please replace dependencies on tomcat7 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:mina2 Version: 2.0.7+dfsg-1 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat7. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in t

Re: groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:00:07AM +, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote: > > Howdy maintainer, > > Your debian/patches are GPL-2. Upstream is apache2. These licenses > are not compatable. > > Please relicense those patches to GPL-3+ or apache2. Hi Paul, thanks for reviewing this package. I a

Bug#759625: solr-tomcat: Please depend on tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: solr-tomcat Version: 3.6.2+dfsg-3 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add a dependency on tomcat8 or replace the current one on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in the next

Bug#759642: jetty: Please replace dependencies on tomcat7 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:jetty Version: 6.1.26-3 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat7. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in the n

Bug#759637: libjboss-remoting-java: Please replace dependencies on tomcat6 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:libjboss-remoting-java Version: 2.5.3.SP1-1 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat versio

groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Richards Tagliamonte
See other mail === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

openjdk-7-jre-dcevm_7u55-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 22:38:09 +0200 Source: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm Binary: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm Architecture: source amd64 Version: 7u55-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: E

groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Richards Tagliamonte
Howdy maintainer, Your debian/patches are GPL-2. Upstream is apache2. These licenses are not compatable. Please relicense those patches to GPL-3+ or apache2. Thanks, Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload ne

Bug#759641: eclipse: Please replace dependencies on tomcat7 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:eclipse Version: 3.8.1-5.1 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat7. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in th

Bug#759638: lucene-solr: Please replace dependencies on tomcat6 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:lucene-solr Version: 3.6.2+dfsg-3 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8

Bug#759623: jenkins-tomcat: Please depend on tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: jenkins-tomcat Version: 1.509.2+dfsg-2 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add a dependency on tomcat8 or replace the current one on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in the

Bug#759636: libjamon-java: Please replace dependencies on tomcat6 with tomcat8

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:libjamon-java Version: 2.7-4 Severity: normal User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: tomcat8-migration Please add dependencies on tomcat8 packages or replace the current ones on tomcat6. debian-java team is aiming for only having one tomcat version (tomcat8) in

Processed: tagging 759619

2014-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 759619 + pending Bug #759619 [src:libreadline-java] libreadline-java: Please fix Vcs-* fields Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 759619: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Processed: owner 759619

2014-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 759619 tmanc...@debian.org Bug #759619 [src:libreadline-java] libreadline-java: Please fix Vcs-* fields Owner recorded as tmanc...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 759619: http://b

Comments regarding openjdk-7-jre-dcevm_7u55-1_amd64.changes

2014-08-28 Thread Paul Richards Tagliamonte
Howdy maintainer, E: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: hardening-wrapper => use dpkg-buildflags instead Appears valid You should address this. Thanks, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#759619: libreadline-java: Please fix Vcs-* fields

2014-08-28 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: src:libreadline-java Version: 0.8.0.1+dfsg-3 Severity: normal Vcs-* fields are obviously wrong. They point to git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/tomcat7.git. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Arch

Re: Help needed with updating some Java libraries (netlib-java, libmtj-java)

2014-08-28 Thread tony mancill
On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the > watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when > tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to > Github. While I updated th

libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:43:52 +0200 Source: libapache-poi-java Binary: libapache-poi-java libapache-poi-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 3.10.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Mainta

Processing of libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1_amd64.changes

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1_all.deb libopensaml2-java-doc_2.6.2-1_all.deb libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1.dsc libopensaml2-java_2.6.2.orig.tar.xz libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings,

clojure1.6 1.6.0+dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

2014-08-28 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the clojure1.6 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.6.0+dfsg-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

Processing of libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1_all.deb libapache-poi-java-doc_3.10.1-1_all.deb libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1.dsc libapache-poi-java_3.10.1.orig.tar.xz libapache-poi-java_3.10.1-1.debian.tar.xz G

Bug#759470: marked as done (libopensaml2-java: CVE-2014-3603)

2014-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:08:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#759470: fixed in libopensaml2-java 2.6.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #759470, regarding libopensaml2-java: CVE-2014-3603 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

libopensaml2-java_2.6.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:21:20 -0700 Source: libopensaml2-java Binary: libopensaml2-java libopensaml2-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.6.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainer

Bug#759565: marked as done (service-wrapper: new upstream release available)

2014-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:49:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#759565: fixed in service-wrapper-java 3.5.25-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #759565, regarding service-wrapper: new upstream release available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

service-wrapper-java_3.5.25-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:34:11 -0700 Source: service-wrapper-java Binary: service-wrapper libservice-wrapper-java libservice-wrapper-jni libservice-wrapper-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 3.5.25-1 Distribution:

Bug#759565: service-wrapper: new upstream release available

2014-08-28 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:21:03PM +, Kill Your TV wrote: > Package: service-wrapper > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > It would be nice to have Jessie released with a newer service-wrapper > package. Please consider updating to the latest stable release (3.5.25). > > Attached is a patch

Processing of service-wrapper-java_3.5.25-1_amd64.changes

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
service-wrapper-java_3.5.25-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: service-wrapper_3.5.25-1_amd64.deb libservice-wrapper-java_3.5.25-1_all.deb libservice-wrapper-jni_3.5.25-1_amd64.deb libservice-wrapper-doc_3.5.25-1_all.deb service-wrapper-java_3.5.25-1.

Bug#759565: service-wrapper: new upstream release available

2014-08-28 Thread Kill Your TV
Package: service-wrapper Severity: wishlist Tags: patch It would be nice to have Jessie released with a newer service-wrapper package. Please consider updating to the latest stable release (3.5.25). Attached is a patch against the 3.5.22 service-wrapper packaging. Due to hardening-wrapper's obso

Please condifer a free software license

2014-08-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, some time ago there was a discussion[1] about the f2c lincense, specifically about the part goto_trans/* which says: ... it is freely available without fee for education, research, and non-profit purposes. The restriction to certain purposes is considered non-free according to the Open Sou

Help needed with updating some Java libraries (netlib-java, libmtj-java)

2014-08-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to Github. While I updated the URLs in SVN accordingly I noticed that the Build system

libphonenumber_6.3~svn698-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:59:31 +0200 Source: libphonenumber Binary: libphonenumber6-java libphonenumber6-dev libphonenumber6 Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 6.3~svn698-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintai

Processing of libphonenumber_6.3~svn698-1_amd64.changes

2014-08-28 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libphonenumber_6.3~svn698-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libphonenumber6-java_6.3~svn698-1_all.deb libphonenumber6-dev_6.3~svn698-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber6_6.3~svn698-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber_6.3~svn698-1.dsc libphonenumber_6.3~svn698.orig.tar