Bug#878994: please drop transitional package libzookeeper2

Package: libzookeeper2 Version: 3.4.5+dfsg-2+deb8u2 Severity: normal user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org usertags: transitional Please drop the transitional package libzookeeper2 for buster, as it has been released with wheezy, jessie and stretch already. Thanks for maintaining zookeeper! -

Bug#878604: please drop transitional package jfugue

Package: jfugue Version: 4.0.3-3 Severity: normal user: qa.debian@packages.debian.org usertags: transitional Please drop the transitional package jfugue for buster, as it has been released with wheezy, jessie and stretch already. Thanks for maintaining jfugue! -- cheers, Holger s

Bug#793500: libhtmlparser-java: /​usr/​share/​doc/​libhtmlparser-​java-​doc/​api/​ is not always included in the built package

Source: libhtmlparser-java Version: 1.6.20060610.dfsg0-5 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: locales Dear Maintainer, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that libhtmlparser-java does not always incl

Bug#792838: sitemesh: fails to build properly _and_ silently, when LC_ALL is not set

Source: sitemesh Version: 2.4.1+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Tags: sid x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs Dear Maintainer, sitemesh builds differently in our setup, that is the installed size of ​ libsitemesh-​ja

Bug#788353: locales-all provides: locales, but not all files locales provide

Hi Tony, On Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2015, tony mancill wrote: > Nice job tracking down the root cause of this FTBFS error. thanks! :) > I'd kind of > prefer for locales-all to get it's act together instead of declaring a > Build-Conflicts against locales-all, but I don't want jblas to get > remove

Bug#714509: what?

what is this bug about? what's the effect? __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#696816: patches look good, comments not :)

Hi, I've reviewed http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jenkins/jenkins_1.447.2+dfsg-2.1.dsc and compared to the actual commits in jenkins git and found that the patches were the right ones, but the comments were wrong, referring the other one: $ git show 1d48e7bf8254349a19328d56bd8006

Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

On Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > You should have a look at old "make-jpkg" tool[..] No, thanks, I shall not. I already have a working solution. > (but someone has to do the work to support newer JDK in this > tool). __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java

Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: > the DLJ bundles were created because you are not allowed to re-distribute > the jdk packages from oracle. Did that change recently? I believe inside an organisation I can rebundle their bundles to my prefered kind of bundle, that is, form of

Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

Hi, I forgot: On Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, Holger Levsen wrote: > $ debdiff sun-java6_6.26-3.dsc sun-java6_6.29-1.dsc|diffstat > debian/changelog |8 > debian/rules |6 > jdk-6u26-dlj-linux-amd64.bin |327520 > ---

Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

@@ +sun-java6 (6.29-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * New upstream version to fix + http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpuoct2011-443431.html#AppendixJAVA + + -- Holger Levsen Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:49:02 +0100 + sun-java6 (6.26-3) unstable

Bug#575411: workaround

Hi Mathieu, On Samstag, 22. Oktober 2011, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > As one of the many fop maintainers, I would vote *against* backporting > fop 1.0 to squeeze (quite strongly actually). See bug #610344 and more > recently #646141. ok. > The question now becomes should we backport 0.95 with a p

Bug#575411: workaround

Hi, as a workaround one can rebuild xmlgraphics-commons and fop from wheezy. (A newer version of xml-graphics-common is needed for the newer fop.) xmlgraphics-commons_1.4.dfsg-3.dsc and fop_1.0.dfsg2-3.dsc built fine for me in a pure squeeze environment. cheers, Holger __ This is t

Bug#575411: update for stable?

Hi, from #debian-java * h01ger wonders if you think #575411 is a.) important and b.) warants a fix in squeeze.. h01ger: can you follow up on the bug asking for a stable update? sure cheers, Holger __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#610921: ITP: felix-framework -- The Felix Framework subproject

Hi, On Montag, 24. Januar 2011, Andres Mejia wrote: > Description : The Felix Framework subproject > > The Felix Framework subproject is an implementation > of the OSGi R4.2 core framework specification. please add some tiny description what that does / is useful for / uses what technolo

Re: Bug#552480: base: GTK dialog stopped working

reassign 552480 eclipse thanks On Montag, 26. Oktober 2009, Martin wrote: > Package: base > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > A week about the file search dialog in Eclipse stopped working. I tested > it with eclipse Ganymede and Galileo from eclipse.org. > > When I