refrain from ideological discussion about free vs non-free software please?
Best Regards,
Jan Henke
Jan Henke | Softwareentwickler
Hugendubel Digital GmbH & Co. KG
Friesenweg 1 | D-22763 Hamburg
Telefon: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 109 | Telefax: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 113
E-Mail: jhe...@hugendubel-digita
cause it is non free software".
Best Regards,
Jan Henke
Jan Henke | Softwareentwickler
Hugendubel Digital GmbH & Co. KG
Friesenweg 1 | D-22763 Hamburg
Telefon: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 109 | Telefax: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 113
E-Mail: jhe...@hugendubel-digital.de
www.hugendubel.de – Die W
Package: java-package
Version: 0.60
Severity: normal
Given the following situation. I have openjdk-8-jdk installed from the
archive. For work I need the Oracle JDK, so I download the *.tar.gz and
create a debian package from it with java-package. I install the created
package, so I have both the
Am 09.10.2014 um 09:27 schrieb Mauro Molinari:
Il 06/10/2014 12:09, Emmanuel Bourg ha scritto:
libjetty8-java-doc already recommends default-jdk-doc, maybe you
meant suggested instead?
I may have used the wrong terms here, sorry. What I find questionable
is that, as I said in my original
Am 09.10.2014 um 10:06 schrieb Mauro Molinari:
Il 09/10/2014 09:47, Jan Henke ha scritto:
Hi, I do think it is reasonable to assume that installing an optional
documentation package of one component normally also installs the
documentation for other related packages. Especially it does seem
5 matches
Mail list logo