El mié, 01-08-2007 a las 07:49 +0200, Michael Koch escribió:
tag 425020 patch
thanks
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Javier Kohen wrote:
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-4
Severity: normal
I noticed that leaving TOMCAT5_USER empty in /etc/default/tomcat5.5 is not
tag 425020 pending
thanks
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:12:01PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:41PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
David Pashley wrote:
I still think the documentation is wrong and that if you want to disable
tomcat at boot then you should disable it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 425020 pending
Bug#425020: tomcat5.5: Does not honor empty TOMCAT5_USER
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
I still think the documentation is wrong and that if you want to disable
tomcat at boot then you should disable it in your rc.d system. Seems
pointless is implementing yet another scheme for disabling tomcat.
Changing rc.d also has the advantage that you can just start it manually
without having
David Pashley wrote:
I still think the documentation is wrong and that if you want to disable
tomcat at boot then you should disable it in your rc.d system.
I tend to agree. And I think the current behaviour is correct - if the
TOMCAT5_USER variable is empty, the init script must provide a
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:01:41PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
David Pashley wrote:
I still think the documentation is wrong and that if you want to disable
tomcat at boot then you should disable it in your rc.d system.
I tend to agree. And I think the current behaviour is correct - if the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 425020 patch
Bug#425020: tomcat5.5: Does not honor empty TOMCAT5_USER
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tag 425020 patch
thanks
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Javier Kohen wrote:
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-4
Severity: normal
I noticed that leaving TOMCAT5_USER empty in /etc/default/tomcat5.5 is not
preventing the launcher from starting Tomcat during boot. This was working
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.20-4
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed that leaving TOMCAT5_USER empty in /etc/default/tomcat5.5 is not
preventing the launcher from starting Tomcat during boot. This was working with
Tomcat 5.0 in Debian.
The current init
9 matches
Mail list logo