Am 16.10.2017 um 17:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> Control: clone -1 -2
> Control: reassign -1 libbrowserlauncher-java
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 04:08:06PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> ...
>> Please remove libbrowserlauncher-java from Debian. Its features are
>>
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #859005 [ftp.debian.org] RM: libbrowserlauncher-java --
ROM;obsolete;rc-buggy
Bug 859005 cloned as bug 878765
> reassign -1 libbrowserlauncher-java
Bug #859005 [ftp.debian.org] RM: libbrowserlauncher-java --
ROM;obsolete;rc-buggy
Bug reassigned
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #859005 [libbrowserlauncher-java] libbrowserlauncher-java: properties file
not included
Bug reassigned from package 'libbrowserlauncher-java' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 RM: libbrowserlauncher-java -- ROM;obsolete;rc-buggy
Control: severity -1 normal
Am 16.10.2017 um 16:00 schrieb Ole Streicher:
> For me as well...
>
> On 16.10.2017 15:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:12:38PM +0200,
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I am just cleaning up a bit. Is there any reason why we should keep
> libbrowserlauncher-java in Debian? Apparently its features are provided
> by the JDK nowadays and it seems to have no r-deps anymore.
>
> If I don't hear
For me as well...
On 16.10.2017 15:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I am just cleaning up a bit. Is there any reason why we should keep
>> libbrowserlauncher-java in Debian? Apparently its features are provided
>> by the JDK nowadays
Hi,
I am just cleaning up a bit. Is there any reason why we should keep
libbrowserlauncher-java in Debian? Apparently its features are provided
by the JDK nowadays and it seems to have no r-deps anymore.
If I don't hear anything from you, I'm going to reassign this package to
ftp.debian.org and
Hi Emmanuel,
Am 04.04.2017 um 10:52 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Excellent question, this needs some testing with various desktop
> environments.
I wrote a short test script and run it under Stretch and Jessie chroots,
right after
(jessie)oles@donar:~$ sudo apt install default-jre
Le 30/03/2017 à 14:21, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> IMO that makes the BrowserLauncher package *really* obsolete here.
I agree, BrowserLauncher was interesting before Java 6, but the Desktop
API is good enough for most usages now.
Emmanuel Bourg
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java
9 matches
Mail list logo
