Your message dated Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:59:45 +0100
with message-id <20170411125945.gb19...@blind.goeswhere.com>
and subject line jython: doesn't actually have timestamps in javadoc
has caused the Debian Bug report #859973,
regarding jython: please make the javadoc build reproducible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
859973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859973
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: jython
Version: 2.5.3-16
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Priority: wishlist
The javadoc in jython contains timestamps, which prevent the
package from building reproducibly. Please pass the -notimestamp
argument to javadoc. This can be done by adding:
<arg value="-notimestamp"/>
..to the "javadocs" <javadoc section, at line ~756 in build.xml.
https://sources.debian.net/src/jython/2.5.3-16/build.xml/#L756
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/jython.html
Cheers.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Okay, my bad. You're right, there aren't timestamps in the javadoc here.
I'm pretty sure I double checked this. I wonder what I was looking at.
I'll raise different bugs if and when I get around to the other issues.
Sorry!
--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
