Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-23 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Bertels wrote: Oh, before I forget. Something I've wanted to ask: Is there any interest in taking the packages and officially make them part of Debian? Yes, absolutely (see bugs #512396 and #502851). I'm not a DD so cannot upload

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-23 Thread Christopher Bertels
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:03:26 schrieb Marcus Better: Christopher Bertels wrote: Seems unlikely that they would break API in a minor version of logback, so it shouldn't be a problem. Well, it builds fine with version 0.9.9 and doesn't build with the packaged version (newer, = 1.0

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-22 Thread Christopher Bertels
On Monday 21 September 2009 22:13:37 Marcus Better wrote: It's up to you, but if you use git it is a good idea to keep separate branches for upstream sources and debian packaging. Yeah, makes more sense. I just put it all together for now, since i simply wanted to keep track of changes. The

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-22 Thread Christopher Bertels
Hi, I've got a buildable version ready, you can get the packages here: http://files.kolab.org/apt/sesame2/ It's still not fully finished (need to clean up most packages - like adding copyright etc...) When starting Nepomuk, Sesame2 seems to get started as the storage backend, but then I get

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-21 Thread Marcus Better
-orig-source target does not work (missing watch file). http://gitorious.org/soprano-backend-sesame2/libaduna-commons-collections-java Are you using git-svn to mirror the upstream repo (which IIRC is using svn), or just importing sources manually? Cheers, Marcus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-21 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Bertels wrote: Are you using git-svn to mirror the upstream repo (which IIRC is using svn), or just importing sources manually? I've imported them manually via svn export. I guess I could set up a mirror though, if that is a preferred

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-18 Thread Christopher Bertels
Hi, On Thursday 17 September 2009 18:51:55 Christopher Bertels wrote: From a quick inspection, the Spring jars found in the sesame2 jar are not needed (although we have Spring Framework in Debian now). Most of the rest is packaged by now except for the bunch of aduna-commons jars. These

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-17 Thread Christopher Bertels
here, if you want to: http://gitorious.org/soprano-backend-sesame2/libaduna-commons-collections-java Next up are aduna-commons-concurrent and aduna-commons-iterators I'd like to hear some feedback, since I'm still new to packaging stuff, especially Java sources. From a quick inspection

Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-16 Thread Christopher Bertels
Hello, I was wondering if there have been any efforts towards packaging Sesame2 as a Soprano backend for use with Nepomuk? I'm currently working as an intern at Intevation GmbH in Osnabrück, Germany and am currently starting to work on something like this. I'm new to packaging (Java) stuff

Re: Sesame2 backend for soprano

2009-09-16 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Bertels wrote: I was wondering if there have been any efforts towards packaging Sesame2 as a Soprano backend for use with Nepomuk? I looked at it briefly. See bugs #512396 and #502851. Feel free to take over the ITP if you work