-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, but I do not see what is wrong with
the following piece of code (*). Is there a restriction when using ecj
as the java compiler ?
The manpage for ecj indicates that it is building with
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, but I do not see what is wrong with
the following piece of code (*). Is there a restriction when using ecj
as the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability glitch (user is
alowed to set other java compiler).
It's certainly OK, even necessary in this case.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability glitch (user is
alowed to set other java compiler).
It's certainly OK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Onkar Shinde wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code
It's certainly OK, even necessary in this case.
Please make sure that the package dependencies reflect that the
package is built with
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Onkar Shindeonkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability
Hi there,
I must be doing something wrong, but I do not see what is wrong with
the following piece of code (*). Is there a restriction when using ecj
as the java compiler ? This seems to be the default when upload a
package with Build-Depends: default-jdk-builddep
(*)
$ /usr/bin/javac
7 matches
Mail list logo
