Processed: unarchiving 652049, user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com, usertagging 652049, archiving 652049

2012-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 unarchive 652049
Bug #652049 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [excalibur-logkit] 
excalibur-logkit: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 + tidy misc lintian warnings
Unarchived Bug 652049
 user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was draz...@debian.org).
 usertags 652049 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#652049: excalibur-logkit: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 + tidy misc lintian 
warnings
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 652049
Bug #652049 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [excalibur-logkit] 
excalibur-logkit: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 + tidy misc lintian warnings
archived 652049 to archive/49 (from 652049)
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
652049: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652049
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processed (with 2 errors): unarchiving 651422, user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com, usertagging 651422, archiving 651422 ...

2012-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 unarchive 651422
Bug #651422 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [jericho-html] 
jericho-html: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 651422
 user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (was draz...@debian.org).
 usertags 651422 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651422: jericho-html: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651422
Bug #651422 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [jericho-html] 
jericho-html: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
archived 651422 to archive/22 (from 651422)
 unarchive 652046
Bug #652046 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libitext1-java] 
libitext1-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 652046
 usertags 652046 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#652046: libitext1-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 652046
Bug #652046 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libitext1-java] 
libitext1-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
archived 652046 to archive/46 (from 652046)
 unarchive 651536
Bug #651536 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libdtdparser-java] 
libdtdparser-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 651536
 usertags 651536 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651536: libdtdparser-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651536
Bug #651536 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libdtdparser-java] 
libdtdparser-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
archived 651536 to archive/36 (from 651536)
 unarchive 651419
Bug #651419 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [httpunit] httpunit: Fix 
FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 651419
 usertags 651419 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651419: httpunit: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651419
Bug #651419 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [httpunit] httpunit: Fix 
FTBFS with OpenJDK7
archived 651419 to archive/19 (from 651419)
 unarchive 651810
Bug #651810 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libhibernate3-java] 
libhibernate3-java: Patch to Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 and avoid incremental 
build on Ubuntu
Unarchived Bug 651810
 usertags 651810 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651810: libhibernate3-java: Patch to Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 and avoid 
incremental build on Ubuntu
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651810
Bug #651810 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libhibernate3-java] 
libhibernate3-java: Patch to Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7 and avoid incremental 
build on Ubuntu
archived 651810 to archive/10 (from 651810)
 unarchive 652042
Bug #652042 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} 
[libhibernate-jbosscache-java] libhibernate-jbosscache-java: Fix FTBFS with 
OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 652042
 usertags 652042 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#652042: libhibernate-jbosscache-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 652042
Bug #652042 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} 
[libhibernate-jbosscache-java] libhibernate-jbosscache-java: Fix FTBFS with 
OpenJDK7
archived 652042 to archive/42 (from 652042)
 unarchive 651185
Bug #651185 {Done: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org} [libsaxon-java] 
libsaxon-java: Patch to fix FTBFS with openjdk-7
Unarchived Bug 651185
 usertags 651185 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651185: libsaxon-java: Patch to fix FTBFS with openjdk-7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651185
Bug #651185 {Done: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org} [libsaxon-java] 
libsaxon-java: Patch to fix FTBFS with openjdk-7
archived 651185 to archive/85 (from 651185)
 unarchive 651535
Bug #651535 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [jxplorer] jxplorer: Fix 
FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 651535
 usertags 651535 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#651535: jxplorer: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition origin-ubuntu precise.
 archive 651535
Bug #651535 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [jxplorer] jxplorer: Fix 
FTBFS with OpenJDK7
archived 651535 to archive/35 (from 651535)
 unarchive 652045
Bug #652045 {Done: Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc} [libisrt-java] 
libisrt-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Unarchived Bug 652045
 usertags 652045 + openjdk-7-transition
Bug#652045: libisrt-java: Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK7
Usertags were: ubuntu-patch origin-ubuntu precise.
Usertags are now: 

Bug#675160: sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z

2012-06-02 Thread Gilles Filippini
severity 675160 normal
tags 675160 + moreinfo unreproducible
quit


Hi,

hennr a écrit , Le 30/05/2012 11:36:
 Package: sikuli-ide
 Version: 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-3
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 sikuli can't process an application like this one:
 
 openApp(icedove)
 
 
 Full error message is:
 
 
 [error] Stopped
 [error] An error occurs at line 1
 [error] Error message:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 File , line 1, in
 File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/__init__.py, line 3, in
 from Sikuli import *
 File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py, line 34, in
 from Region import *
 File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py, line 9, in
 import inspect
 File /usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py, line 31, in
 import sys, os, types, string, re, dis, imp, tokenize, linecache
 File /usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py, line 45, in
 from posix import *
 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z
 at org.python.modules.posix.PosixModule.classDictInit(PosixModule.java:106)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
 at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
 a
 
 t java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
 at org.python.core.PyJavaType.init(PyJavaType.java:534)
 at org.python.core.PyType.createType(PyType.java:1264)
 at org.python.core.PyType.addFromClass(PyType.java:1201)
 at org.python.core.PyType.fromClass(PyType.java:1291)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromClass(imp.java:405)
 at org.python.core.imp.loadBuiltin(imp.java:501)
 at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:452)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
 at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
 at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
 at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
 at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
 at org.python.core.imp.importAll(imp.java:998)
 at os$py.f$0(/usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py:691)
 at os$py.call_function(/usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py)
 at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
 at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
 
 
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
 at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:573)
 at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:473)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
 at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
 at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
 at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
 at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
 at org.python.core.imp.importOne(imp.java:903)
 at inspect$py.f$0(/usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py:903)
 at inspect$py.call_function(/usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py)
 at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
 at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
 at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:573)
 at org.python.core.imp.find_module(i
 
 mp.java:473)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_first(imp.java:743)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:834)
 at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
 at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
 at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
 at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
 at org.python.core.imp.importOne(imp.java:903)
 at sikuli.Region$py.f$0(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py:16)
 at sikuli.Region$py.call_function(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py)
 at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
 at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
 at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:576)
 at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:473)
 at org.python.core.PyModule.impAttr(PyModule.java:100)
 at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:715)
 at or
 
 g.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
 at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
 at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
 at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
 at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
 at org.python.core.imp.importAll(imp.java:998)
 at sikuli.Sikuli$py.f$0(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py:211)
 at sikuli.Sikuli$py.call_function(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py)
 at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
 at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
 at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
 at 

Processed: Re: Bug#675160: sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z

2012-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 675160 normal
Bug #675160 [sikuli-ide] sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, 
NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
 tags 675160 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #675160 [sikuli-ide] sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, 
NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
675160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675160
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processing of rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc
  rxtx_2.2pre2-11.debian.tar.gz
  librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
  librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processing of rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
/rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes is already present on target host:
librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes removed.

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


rxtx_2.2pre2-11_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
  to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
  to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
rxtx_2.2pre2-11.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-11.debian.tar.gz
rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc
  to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc


Changes:
rxtx (2.2pre2-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * debian/patches/MonitorThread-daemon.patch
- Mark threads created by RXTX as daemon so JVM can shut down
  gracefully. Thanks to Christopher Wellons (Closes: #674975)
  * debian/patches/fhs_lock_buffer_overflow_fix.patch
- Prevents java from failing with buffer overflow when a locked serial
  debice is opened. Thanks to Sergio Talens-Oliag (Closes: #673778)


Override entries for your package:
librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb - extra debug
librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb - optional java
rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc - source libs

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 673778 674975 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#674975: marked as done (librxtx-java: created Java threads are not marked as daemon)

2012-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:29:52 +
with message-id e1saqh2-000564...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#674975: fixed in rxtx 2.2pre2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #674975,
regarding librxtx-java: created Java threads are not marked as daemon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
674975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: librxtx-java
Version: 2.2pre2-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

Threads created in Java by RXTX are not marked as daemon. They hold
the JVM open so that it can't shut down gracefully, as it normally
does when all non-daemon threads have completed. So Java applications
using RXTX can only exit by a System.exit(0).

The threads are an implementation detail, invisible to users of the
library, so users shouldn't be relying on these threads being
non-dameon.

The attached patch makes all RXTX threads daemon threads. I've been
using this patch successfully for 6 months now. I intended to submit
this to upstream, but it seems to be dead right now.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages librxtx-java depends on:
ii  libc6  2.13-32

librxtx-java recommends no packages.

librxtx-java suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- a/src/gnu/io/I2C.java
+++ b/src/gnu/io/I2C.java
@@ -468,7 +468,9 @@
 		private boolean BI=false;
 		private boolean Data=false;
 		private boolean Output=false;
-		MonitorThread() { }
+		MonitorThread() {
+			setDaemon(true);
+		}
 		public void run() {
 			eventLoop();
 		}
--- a/src/gnu/io/LPRPort.java
+++ b/src/gnu/io/LPRPort.java
@@ -366,7 +366,9 @@
 {
 	private boolean monError = false;
 	private boolean monBuffer = false;
-		MonitorThread() { }
+		MonitorThread() {
+			setDaemon(true);
+		}
 		public void run()
 		{
 			eventLoop();
--- a/src/gnu/io/RS485.java
+++ b/src/gnu/io/RS485.java
@@ -465,7 +465,9 @@
 		private boolean BI=false;
 		private boolean Data=false;
 		private boolean Output=false;
-		MonitorThread() { }
+		MonitorThread() {
+			setDaemon(true);
+		}
 		public void run() {
 			eventLoop();
 		}
--- a/src/gnu/io/RXTXPort.java
+++ b/src/gnu/io/RXTXPort.java
@@ -1629,6 +1629,7 @@
 
 		MonitorThread() 
 		{
+			setDaemon(true);
 			if (debug)
 z.reportln( RXTXPort:MontitorThread:MonitorThread()); 
 		}
--- a/src/gnu/io/Raw.java
+++ b/src/gnu/io/Raw.java
@@ -466,7 +466,9 @@
 		private boolean BI=false;
 		private boolean Data=false;
 		private boolean Output=false;
-		MonitorThread() { }
+		MonitorThread() {
+			setDaemon(true);
+		}
 		public void run() {
 			eventLoop();
 		}
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: rxtx
Source-Version: 2.2pre2-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rxtx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
  to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java-dbg_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
  to main/r/rxtx/librxtx-java_2.2pre2-11_i386.deb
rxtx_2.2pre2-11.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-11.debian.tar.gz
rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc
  to main/r/rxtx/rxtx_2.2pre2-11.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 674...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Howard show...@debian.org (supplier of updated rxtx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 10:13:50 -0400
Source: rxtx
Binary: librxtx-java librxtx-java-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2pre2-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers 
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Scott Howard show...@debian.org
Description: 
 librxtx-java - Full Java CommAPI implementation
 librxtx-java-dbg - Full Java CommAPI implementation, Debugging Symbols
Closes: 673778 674975
Changes: 
 rxtx (2.2pre2-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * 

Processing of trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc
  trove3_3.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  trove3_3.0.2-1.debian.tar.gz
  libtrove3-java_3.0.2-1_all.deb
  libtrove3-java-doc_3.0.2-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processing of trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters
trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc
  trove3_3.0.2.orig.tar.gz
  trove3_3.0.2-1.debian.tar.gz
  libtrove3-java_3.0.2-1_all.deb
  libtrove3-java-doc_3.0.2-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2012-06-02 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Reject Reasons:
'dpkg-source -x' failed for trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc. (Command '('dpkg-source', 
'--no-copy', '--no-check', '-q', '-x', 'trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc', 
'/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/tmpEWgHjK/root')' returned non-zero exit status 
9)



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#657870: some more struts issues

2012-06-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi,

I'm sorry, but we've got yet another set of struts vulnerabilities:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2087
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-2088
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-0838

It would be really helpful if you could check how these affect Debian aswell.


thanks,
Thijs




__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.