Bug#859973: jython: please make the javadoc build reproducible

Source: jython Version: 2.5.3-16 User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Priority: wishlist The javadoc in jython contains timestamps, which prevent the package from building reproducibly. Please pass the -notimestamp argument to javadoc. This can be done by adding:

Bug#859973: jython: please make the javadoc build reproducible

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 08:46:17PM +0100, Chris West wrote: > Source: jython > Version: 2.5.3-16 > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: timestamps > Priority: wishlist > > The javadoc in jython contains timestamps, which prevent the > package from building reproducibly.

Bug#859977: sacjava: please make the javadoc build reproducible

Source: sacjava Version: 1.3+dfsg-2 User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Priority: wishlist sacjava mbeds timestamps in its javadoc, which makes the package not reproducible. Please add -notimestamp to your javadoc invocation in debian/rules:17:

Bug#859976: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine: please make the javadoc build reproducible

Source: pentaho-reporting-flow-engine Version: 0.9.4-4 User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Priority: wishlist The javadoc in pentaho-reporting-flow-engine contains timestamps, which prevent the package from building reproducibly. Please pass the -notimestamp

Bug#858876: libjna-jni: causes NoClassDefFoundError

On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:07:43 +0900 YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Thank you for the report. The symlink was in the same directory? What > > JRE did you use? > > Yes, in the same