Bug#359862: lucene: FTBFS: Tries to use jikes without Build-Depends

No need to test. Daniel is right. We'll revise the package. --Jeff ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#364818: kaffe: FTBFS on all architectures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:07:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > >>Hi Steve, > >>I am sorry about that. This happened because of the time passed between >>my (correctly tested build) and the sponsors upload. > > Your sponsor

Bug#359862: lucene: FTBFS: Tries to use jikes without Build-Depends

Le Lundi 24 Avril 2006 11:25, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : > IMHO, we can close this bug. Daniel, can you try to rebuild lucene with > an up-to-date pbuilder? Right now, I'm unable to test it because of #364818. I'll try it again tomorrow. -- Daniel Schepler __

Bug#364818: kaffe: FTBFS on all architectures

On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:07:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Hi Steve, > I am sorry about that. This happened because of the time passed between > my (correctly tested build) and the sponsors upload. Your sponsor should be checking the buildability of the package as well, not just accepting b

Bug#359862: oops

Testing now on my pbuilder chroot. Worked, but I could not get the deb out. On the other hand, pdebuild failed for me. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/list

Bug#364818: marked as done (kaffe: FTBFS on all architectures)

Your message dated Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:07:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364818: kaffe: FTBFS on all architectures has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it