Bug#384507: libnsuml-java: FTBFS: You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!

2006-09-04 Thread Thomas Girard
tags 384507 + patch thanks Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:14:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: dpkg-source: extracting libnsuml-java in libnsuml-java-0.4.20 dpkg-buildpackage: source package is libnsuml-java dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.4.20-12 dpkg-buildpackage: host

Bug#385727: marked as done (needs rebuild against libgcj7-0)

2006-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:14:42 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#385727: Acknowledgement (needs rebuild against libgcj7-0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processing of ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes

2006-09-04 Thread Archive Administrator
ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_powerpc.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

ecj-bootstrap_3.2-3_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/e/ecj-bootstrap/ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package: ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2-3_powerpc.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___

Processing of gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes

2006-09-04 Thread Archive Administrator
gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb to pool/main/g/gjdoc/gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb Override entries for your package: gjdoc_0.7.7-3_hppa.deb - optional devel Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Processed: merge eclipse reports

2006-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 356497 eclipse Bug#356497: libswt3.1-gtk-java: depends on mozilla-browser on i386 Bug reassigned from package `libswt3.1-gtk-java' to `eclipse'. forcemerge 356497 364368 Bug#356497: libswt3.1-gtk-java: depends on mozilla-browser on i386

Re: info on tomcat5 package

2006-09-04 Thread Barry Hawkins
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:41:44AM +0530, Shobhit Jindal wrote: hello sirs, i wos disappointed to see that tomcat from debian repository is very old (5.0..30-10) wheras tomcat5.5(presently at 5.5.17) have been released long time back and thus requires a major upgradation am

Re: Bug#385678: ITP: Tomcat5.5 A Java Application Server

2006-09-04 Thread Shobhit Jindal
thanks Barry,am on way to package my first package :)plzz add me to the project tomcat5.5On 9/3/06, Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is already a tomcat5.5 package in experimental:i really missed on that and am definetly joiningDebian Java Packaging Project patches against the

libglade-java REMOVED from testing

2006-09-04 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libglade-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.10.1-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon # 20060830; done 20060831 Bug #381648: FTBFS on ia64 (among other

Re: Bug#385678: ITP: Tomcat5.5 A Java Application Server

2006-09-04 Thread Shobhit Jindal
am still waiting for a response :(On 9/3/06, Shobhit Jindal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Barry,am on way to package my first package :)plzz add me to the project tomcat5.5On 9/3/06, Barry Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is already a tomcat5.5 package in experimental: i really missed