Processed: tomcat5.5: error instantiating 'org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager'

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 395167 confirmed Bug#395167: tomcat5.5: error instantiating 'org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager' There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed severity 395167 serious Bug#395167: tomcat5.5: error instantiating

Bug#395167: tomcat5.5: error instantiating 'org.apache.juli.ClassLoaderLogManager'

The reason is probably that the /var/lib/tomcat5.5/conf/logging.conf file is missing. The Sun JDK supplies its own config file which probably gets substituted, and it apparently doesn't barf on the missing config file, but the logging configuration is all wrong...

Bug#395264: commons-pool: requires internet access during build

I'm onto it. Going to upload a new upstream release to main. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 395264 pending Bug#395264: commons-pool: requires internet access during build There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#395366: libcommons-jexl-java: FTBFS: sablevm: cannot create vm

Package: libcommons-jexl-java Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package failed to build on i386. Relevant parts: /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules

Bug#395400: java-package: please Provides: jar for the sdk packages

Package: java-package Version: 0.28 Severity: minor Tags: patch I have a program which requires an implementation of jar at build-time. The Build-Depends line is non-trivial because nobody specifies a jar virtual package. Please adjust the sdk packages to Provides: jar. Patch attached.

Bug#395400: java-package: please Provides: jar for the sdk packages

Hi On Friday 27 October 2006 05:26, Jon Dowland wrote: I have a program which requires an implementation of jar at build-time. The Build-Depends line is non-trivial because nobody specifies a jar virtual package. Any reason you can't just depend on fastjar? Package: fastjar Uncompressed

Bug#395400: java-package: please Provides: jar for the sdk packages

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:03:19AM +1000, Andrew Vaughan wrote: Any reason you can't just depend on fastjar? That's what I am doing, right now. But, if a user has another jar implementation installed, it's not ideal to force them to install fastjar rather than use their preferred one. -- Jon