Bug#403039: libjaxen-java: could you provide -beta12 it fixes a bug

Package: libjaxen-java Version: 1.1~beta11-1 Severity: normal using beta12 the problem I reported in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JAXEN-175 is fixed . Please provides the new one. Greetings Alban -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Processed: Re: Bug#403039: libjaxen-java: could you provide -beta12 it fixes a bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 403039 dom4j Bug#403039: libjaxen-java: could you provide -beta12 it fixes a bug Bug reassigned from package `libjaxen-java' to `dom4j'. retitle 403039 dom4j: jaxen classes missing Bug#403039: libjaxen-java: could you provide -beta12 it fixes

Bug#403039: libjaxen-java: could you provide -beta12 it fixes a bug

reassign 403039 dom4j retitle 403039 dom4j: jaxen classes missing severity 403039 serious tag 403039 pending thanks Hi, the problem is in the dom4j package in Debian, which is missing a few classes. In the future, please report problems with Debian packages to the Debian bug tracking system

Bug#403052: libdom4j-java: re-enable test case BeansTest

Package: libdom4j-java Version: 1.6.1+dfsg-1 Severity: minor The test case BeansTest can be re-enabled during build, if we tell Swing not to use X11 (perhaps -Djava.awt.headless=true is enough). Relevant svn entry: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java?op=comp[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import java/lang/management/MemoryUsage is not valid

tags 400172 - unreproducible severity 400172 serious thanks On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: cacao Version: 0.97-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64, already has amd64 binaries in etch Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a rebuild of all

Processed: Re: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import java/lang/management/MemoryUsage is not valid

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 400172 - unreproducible Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import java/lang/management/MemoryUsage is not valid Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible severity 400172 serious Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import

Processing of dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2_i386.changes

dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.dsc dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.diff.gz libdom4j-java_1.6.1+dfsg-2_all.deb libdom4j-java-doc_1.6.1+dfsg-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dom4j/dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.diff.gz dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.dsc to pool/main/d/dom4j/dom4j_1.6.1+dfsg-2.dsc libdom4j-java-doc_1.6.1+dfsg-2_all.deb to pool/main/d/dom4j/libdom4j-java-doc_1.6.1+dfsg-2_all.deb libdom4j-java_1.6.1+dfsg-2_all.deb to

Bug#403039: marked as done (dom4j: jaxen classes missing)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#403039: fixed in dom4j 1.6.1+dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#402642: java-package: does not work with sun jre-1.6

Hi! Can you provide this patch here? Thanks in advance. :-) -- -- Chris ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers