Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.7-7
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good
checking for uudecode... no
configure: WARNING: I have to compile Test.class from scratch
checking if
ecj_3.2.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ecj_3.2.2-2.dsc
ecj_3.2.2-2.diff.gz
ecj_3.2.2-2_all.deb
ecj-bootstrap_3.2.2-2_all.deb
ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.2-2_all.deb
ecj-gcj_3.2.2-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 421488 ecj
Bug#421488: gcj-4.1 - FTBFS: Broken recursive build-deps
Bug reassigned from package `gcj-4.1' to `ecj'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Accepted:
ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-bootstrap-gcj_3.2.2-2_all.deb
ecj-bootstrap_3.2.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-bootstrap_3.2.2-2_all.deb
ecj-gcj_3.2.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/ecj/ecj-gcj_3.2.2-2_i386.deb
ecj_3.2.2-2.diff.gz
to
Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:52:02 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421493: gjdoc: FTBFS: gij-wrapper-4.1 failed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Version: 0.7.8-1
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 01:00:44PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.7-7
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good
checking for
Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#421488: fixed in ecj 3.2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
7 matches
Mail list logo