Bug#507536: it does not work here either

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable for eclipse afaict. The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable for eclipse afaict. The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable for eclipse afaict. The only reason it was pursued was because it has the

Bug#526472: groovy: Groovy scripts fail to download dependencies with Grape

Package: groovy Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: important A Groovy script with Grape annotations (@Grab) will not download its dependencies when using the Debian version of Groovy 1.6. This works well on a vanilla Groovy installation. @Grab(group='org.apache.camel', module='camel-groovy',

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?

Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: important After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713, #515747) and read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507536#104 I have been looking at the status of eclipse in Debian. Eclipse's packaging is under the umbrella of the Debian

batik 1.7-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the batik source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.7-2 Current version: 1.7-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

Please restore your account !

___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Attn:Email Account Owner

Accu-Online!!! Ticket no. 4 16 19 25 27 40, Batch no;SPYU6868, Do Contact; Mr.Mark Mejia for Clarification and Claim of 800,000.00 Euro you won in Accu-Online. Accu-Online Claims Office Contact:Dr.Mark Mejia Tel:+34-685-279-789 E-Mail:accuclaimonl...@sify.com Regards, Ms.Maria Alan

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?

I completely agree with Ana, this package needs new fresh blood to maintain it. I repromised myself (some time ago) to give it some love, but I didn't managed to have time to. IMO this should be orphaned, and let another team aggregate to maintain it. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph,

libitext-java_2.1.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libitext-java-gcj_2.1.5-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java-gcj_2.1.5-1_amd64.deb libitext-java_2.1.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java_2.1.5-1.diff.gz libitext-java_2.1.5-1.dsc to pool/main/libi/libitext-java/libitext-java_2.1.5-1.dsc

CIA tracks phones

These are the pilules for men, who want love making to bring more satisfaction http://www.dyjweg.com ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#526553: jclassinfo: FTBFS: libtool error

Package: jclassinfo Version: 0.19.1-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... Making all in jclass make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jclassinfo-0.19.1/jclass' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -g -O2 -Wall -MT

Spice up Your Sex Life for Couples - How To Get Over SOS 'Same Old Sex' Syndrome for Good!

inline: image/png___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers