Bug#623657: sun-java6: is the libxp6 build-dependency necessary?

2011-04-21 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: sun-java6 Version: 6.24-1 Severity: wishlist The xprint package is obsolete and scheduled for removal. A related library is libxp, which provides an API that enables client programs to access and use an Xprint server. Since we're getting rid of xprint, one could argue it makes sense to

Bug#519969: marked as done (wishlist: package 1.2.0)

2011-04-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:02:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#519969: fixed in cdk 1:1.2.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #519969, regarding wishlist: package 1.2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

cdk_1.2.7-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-04-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: cdk_1.2.7-1.debian.tar.gz to main/c/cdk/cdk_1.2.7-1.debian.tar.gz cdk_1.2.7-1.dsc to main/c/cdk/cdk_1.2.7-1.dsc cdk_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz to main/c/cdk/cdk_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz libcdk-java_1.2.7-1_all.deb to main/c/cdk/libcdk-java_1.2.7-1_all.deb Override entries for your package: c

[pkg-java] r13559 - in tags/cdk: . 1:1.2.7-1/debian

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Mancill
Author: tmancill Date: 2011-04-22 03:57:11 + (Fri, 22 Apr 2011) New Revision: 13559 Added: tags/cdk/1:1.2.7-1/ tags/cdk/1:1.2.7-1/debian/changelog Removed: tags/cdk/1:1.2.7-1/debian/changelog Log: [svn-buildpackage] Tagging cdk 1:1.2.7-1 Deleted: tags/cdk/1:1.2.7-1/debian/changelog =

Processing of cdk_1.2.7-1_i386.changes

2011-04-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
cdk_1.2.7-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdk_1.2.7-1.dsc cdk_1.2.7.orig.tar.gz cdk_1.2.7-1.debian.tar.gz libcdk-java_1.2.7-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address

[pkg-java] r13558 - trunk/cdk/debian

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Mancill
Author: tmancill Date: 2011-04-22 03:49:28 + (Fri, 22 Apr 2011) New Revision: 13558 Modified: trunk/cdk/debian/changelog Log: correct typo in changelog Modified: trunk/cdk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/cdk/debian/changelog 2

Bug#623639: fop: is the libxp dependency necessary?

2011-04-21 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: fop Version: 1:1.0.dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist The xprint package is obsolete and scheduled for removal. A related library is libxp, which provides an API that enables client programs to access and use an Xprint server. Since we're getting rid of xprint, one could argue it makes sense to

Bug#623419: "Error: no `client' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.24/jre/lib/amd64/client/libjvm.so'."

2011-04-21 Thread Torsten Werner
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Erik Sundin wrote: > -client IF_SERVER_CLASS -server > -server KNOWN > -hotspot ALIASED_TO -client > -classic WARN > -native ERROR > -green ERROR The package sun-java6-bin_6.24-1_amd64.deb ships the following file (comments removed): -server KNOWN -client IGNORE

libspring-ldap-java 1.3.1.RELEASE-1 MIGRATED to testing

2011-04-21 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libspring-ldap-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.3.0.RELEASE-1 Current version: 1.3.1.RELEASE-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple

Bug#623419: "Error: no `client' JVM at `/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.24/jre/lib/amd64/client/libjvm.so'."

2011-04-21 Thread Erik Sundin
Any command... just "java" or java -jar [any jar file] or anything except java -server... jvm.cfg looked like this before: # %W% %E% # # Copyright (c) 2006, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. # ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license terms. # # # # # List of JVMs

Bug#621398: Patch to use generic db.jar as provided by libdb-java (>= 5.1.4~) and libdb5.1-java (>= 5.1.25-7~)

2011-04-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Package: lucene2 Severity: normal Tags: patch > I'm recovering from being ill, work and family go first, but I'll get there. Sorry to hear that. Hope you are getting better now. > I'm looking into it. To make things easy for you, I have prepared patch which fixes this issue. It needs to wait