Hello libicu4j maintainers,
I'm contacting you to help un-block some items for the upgrade of
Eclipse in Sid, and I figured an email to the Uploaders might help get
this resolved a bit faster :) I also CC'd pkg-java, un case anyone
else has some thoughts as well.
libicu4j is a scitch out of date
Package: eclipse-platform
Version: 3.5.2-10
Severity: normal
I'm guessing this is already a known issue, but I couldn't find another
bug tracking this, so I'm filing this one.
eclipse-platform in sid has a dependency on:
sat4j (>= 2.2.3), sat4j (<< 2.2.4)
However, the version of sat4j in sid is
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package fop
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #610344 (http://bugs.debian.org/610344)
# * http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:swt-gtk
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #631048 (http://bugs.debian.org/631048)
# * https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bu
FYI: The status of the eclipse source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.5.2-9
Current version: 3.5.2-10
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
FYI: The status of the lucene2 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.9.3+ds1-1
Current version: 2.9.4+ds1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the maven-ant-helper source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 7.2
Current version: 7.3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv
FYI: The status of the tomcat7 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 7.0.14-1
Current version: 7.0.16-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will recei
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package fop
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 626069 with 625869
Bug #626069 [src:fop] fop: FTBFS: NativeTextHandler is not abstract and does
not override abstract method drawString in TextHandler
Was blocked by: 625869
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #626069 to the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 626069 with 625869
Bug #626069 [src:fop] fop: FTBFS: NativeTextHandler is not abstract and does
not override abstract method drawString in TextHandler
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 626069: 625869
> thanks
Stopping pr
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "Twitter4J - A Java library for the Twitter API".
The annotated tag, upstream/2.2.3 has been created
at f679cc341375c0c869757a1bc722
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "Twitter4J - A Java library for the Twitter API".
The branch, upstream has been created
at 7a8135509239595f8ad93d19296b5d860988c989
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "Twitter4J - A Java library for the Twitter API".
The branch, master has been created
at 70ade2a8d75de7b76390bed3217ed3f28b902bbf (c
On 2011-07-07 09:18, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:03:17AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>>> I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the
>>> 15th of July. Please update your package
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:03:17AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the
> > 15th of July. Please update your packages by then.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> If
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm planning on a push to unstable of iceweasel/xulrunner 5.0 on the
> 15th of July. Please update your packages by then.
---end quoted text---
If upstream of SWT didn't fix the FTBFS against xulrunner2 by 15th of
July, th
17 matches
Mail list logo