Bug#675160: sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z

2012-05-30 Thread hennr
Package: sikuli-ide
Version: 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

sikuli can't process an application like this one:

openApp(icedove)


Full error message is:


[error] Stopped
[error] An error occurs at line 1
[error] Error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File , line 1, in
File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/__init__.py, line 3, in
from Sikuli import *
File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py, line 34, in
from Region import *
File /usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py, line 9, in
import inspect
File /usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py, line 31, in
import sys, os, types, string, re, dis, imp, tokenize, linecache
File /usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py, line 45, in
from posix import *
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z
at org.python.modules.posix.PosixModule.classDictInit(PosixModule.java:106)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
a

t java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at org.python.core.PyJavaType.init(PyJavaType.java:534)
at org.python.core.PyType.createType(PyType.java:1264)
at org.python.core.PyType.addFromClass(PyType.java:1201)
at org.python.core.PyType.fromClass(PyType.java:1291)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromClass(imp.java:405)
at org.python.core.imp.loadBuiltin(imp.java:501)
at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:452)
at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
at org.python.core.imp.importAll(imp.java:998)
at os$py.f$0(/usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py:691)
at os$py.call_function(/usr/share/jython/Lib/os.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)


at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:573)
at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:473)
at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
at org.python.core.imp.importOne(imp.java:903)
at inspect$py.f$0(/usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py:903)
at inspect$py.call_function(/usr/share/jython/Lib/inspect.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:573)
at org.python.core.imp.find_module(i

mp.java:473)
at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:713)
at org.python.core.imp.import_first(imp.java:743)
at org.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:834)
at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
at org.python.core.imp.importOne(imp.java:903)
at sikuli.Region$py.f$0(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py:16)
at sikuli.Region$py.call_function(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Region.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:576)
at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:473)
at org.python.core.PyModule.impAttr(PyModule.java:100)
at org.python.core.imp.import_next(imp.java:715)
at or

g.python.core.imp.import_name(imp.java:824)
at org.python.core.imp.importName(imp.java:884)
at org.python.core.ImportFunction.__call__(__builtin__.java:1220)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java:357)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.__import__(__builtin__.java:1173)
at org.python.core.imp.importAll(imp.java:998)
at sikuli.Sikuli$py.f$0(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py:211)
at sikuli.Sikuli$py.call_function(/usr/share/sikuli/Lib/sikuli/Sikuli.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java:165)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java:18)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromCode(imp.java:386)
at org.python.core.imp.createFromSource(imp.java:349)
at org.python.core.imp.loadFromSource(imp.java:576)
at org.python.core.imp.find_module(imp.java:473)
at org.python.core.PyModule.impAttr(PyModule.java:100)
at 

Bug#675180: jffi: fix ftbfs with openjdk-7 as default-jdk

2012-05-30 Thread James Page
Package: jffi
Version: 1.0.2-8.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu quantal ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Dear Maintainer,

In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:

  * d/control: Switch BD from openjdk-6-jdk to default-jdk to support
transition to openjdk-7 and fix FTBFS.

Thanks for considering the patch.


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers precise-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 
'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=e+gc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru jffi-1.0.2/debian/changelog jffi-1.0.2/debian/changelog
diff -Nru jffi-1.0.2/debian/control jffi-1.0.2/debian/control
--- jffi-1.0.2/debian/control	2011-09-17 11:32:27.0 +0100
+++ jffi-1.0.2/debian/control	2012-05-30 12:20:13.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Uploaders: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), cdbs, maven-repo-helper, libffi-dev, pkg-config,
- ant-optional, openjdk-6-jdk, junit4
+ ant-optional, default-jdk, junit4
 Standards-Version: 3.9.0
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-java/jffi.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/jffi.git
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#608286: CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default

2012-05-30 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
severity 608286 minor
thanks

 httpOnly has been made the default in Tomcat 7, so this ID is
 essentially about an insecure default setting.

 For Tomcat 6 I don't esee the need to change the default (which might
 even break applications). Instead such settings should be taken into
 account when setting up a Tomcat site.

 For Squeeze you add a README.Debian or such pointing to the option
 and the recommendation to use the option?

I don't think we can update the Squeeze README for this anymore.

A note could be added to the sid version of tomcat6.

However, this is not a vulnerability, only extra hardening which is surely
useful but not a vulnerability in itself. I'm therefore downgrading this
bug to minor: the request to update the README.Debian.


Cheers,
Thijs





__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processed: Re: Bug#608286: CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 608286 minor
Bug #608286 [tomcat6] CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies 
by default
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
608286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608286
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


libtools-logging-clojure 0.2.3-3 MIGRATED to testing

2012-05-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libtools-logging-clojure source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.3-2
  Current version:  0.2.3-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


clucy 0.3.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-05-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the clucy source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.2.2-2
  Current version:  0.3.0-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


clojure1.4 1.4.0+dfsg-2 MIGRATED to testing

2012-05-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the clojure1.4 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.4.0+dfsg-1
  Current version:  1.4.0+dfsg-2

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#675233: jenkins: Please secure access to jenkins or provide instructions to do so

2012-05-30 Thread Olivier Berger
Package: jenkins
Severity: normal

Hi.

By default, AFAICT, Jenkins will be installed running on port 8080, accessible 
from anywhere, and fully configurable by anyone. I believed this is dangerous, 
security wise.

Please either provide a default setup which limits its openness for instance 
allowing only local clients to connect on localhost:8080, or at minimum an 
important message when it gets installed via APT debconf templates, referring 
to a README providing instructions on how to configure its security.

https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Standard+Security+Setup seems a 
good start for such instructions, I guess, but I'm no Jenkins guru.

Best regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#675234: jenkins: Should depend on libjs-yui instead of shipping a copy

2012-05-30 Thread Olivier Berger
Package: jenkins
Severity: normal

Hi.

I've not checked in detail, but I can see lots of YUI JS files in the .war, 
which I believe should instead be used from the system ones packaged in 
libjs-yui.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


swtchart 0.8.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-05-30 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the swtchart source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: (not in testing)
  Current version:  0.8.0-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Processing of jffi_1.0.2-9_amd64.changes

2012-05-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
jffi_1.0.2-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
  jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
  libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
  libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


jffi_1.0.2-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-05-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb


Changes:
jffi (1.0.2-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Team upload.
  * Patch d/control build-dep on default-jdk.  (Closes: #675180)
- Thanks to James Page.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes).
  * d/copyright: update for DEP5 and to address lintian warnings.
  * d/control: update Vcs-Git URL.
 .
jffi (1.0.2-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Non maintainer upload.
  * Fix build failure with GCC 4.7. Closes: #667215.


Override entries for your package:
jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc - source java
libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb - optional java
libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 667215 675180 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#675180: marked as done (jffi: fix ftbfs with openjdk-7 as default-jdk)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 05:17:23 +
with message-id e1szxld-0006n6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#675180: fixed in jffi 1.0.2-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #675180,
regarding jffi: fix ftbfs with openjdk-7 as default-jdk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
675180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: jffi
Version: 1.0.2-8.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu quantal ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Dear Maintainer,

In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:

  * d/control: Switch BD from openjdk-6-jdk to default-jdk to support
transition to openjdk-7 and fix FTBFS.

Thanks for considering the patch.


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers precise-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 
'precise'), (100, 'precise-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=e+gc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru jffi-1.0.2/debian/changelog jffi-1.0.2/debian/changelog
diff -Nru jffi-1.0.2/debian/control jffi-1.0.2/debian/control
--- jffi-1.0.2/debian/control	2011-09-17 11:32:27.0 +0100
+++ jffi-1.0.2/debian/control	2012-05-30 12:20:13.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Uploaders: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), cdbs, maven-repo-helper, libffi-dev, pkg-config,
- ant-optional, openjdk-6-jdk, junit4
+ ant-optional, default-jdk, junit4
 Standards-Version: 3.9.0
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-java/jffi.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/jffi.git
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: jffi
Source-Version: 1.0.2-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jffi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 675...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org (supplier of updated jffi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:48:31 -0700
Source: jffi
Binary: libjffi-java libjffi-jni
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.2-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org
Description: 
 libjffi-java - Java Foreign Function Interface
 libjffi-jni - Java Foreign Function Interface (JNI library)
Closes: 667215 675180
Changes: 
 jffi (1.0.2-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Patch d/control build-dep on default-jdk.  (Closes: #675180)
 - Thanks to James Page.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes).
   * d/copyright: update for 

Bug#667215: marked as done (jffi: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 05:17:23 +
with message-id e1szxld-0006n3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#667215: fixed in jffi 1.0.2-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #667215,
regarding jffi: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
667215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: jffi
Version: 1.0.2-8
Severity: important
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.7/g++-4.7, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.6/g++-4.6. The
severity of this report may be raised before the wheezy release.

[exec] cc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mimpure-text'

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/29-clang-gcc47/unstable-gcc47/jffi_1.0.2-8_unstable-gcc47.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

Some hints on fixing these issues can be found at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html

To build with GCC 4.7, either set CC=gcc-4.7 CXX=g++-4.7 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

[...]
[javac] Compiling 30 source files to /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/classes
[javac] Init.java:171: warning: [deprecation] toURL() in java.io.File has 
been deprecated
[javac] url = jar.toURL();
[javac]  ^
[javac] 1 warning

-generate-version-source:
 [echo] Generating Version.java
[mkdir] Created dir: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/java/com/kenai/jffi

-generate-version:
[javac] Compiling 1 source file to /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/classes

-compile-java:

-generate-native-headers:

-build-native-library:
 [exec] make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
 [exec] cc -o /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/libjffi-1.0.so  -shared 
-mimpure-text -static-libgcc -Wl,-soname,libjffi-1.0.so -Wl,-O1  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Array.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/CallContext.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/ClosureMagazine.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Exception.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/FastIntInvoke.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/FastLongInvoke.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/FastNumericInvoker.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Foreign.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Function.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Internals.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Invoke.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/LastError.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Library.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Memory.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/MemoryIO.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/MemoryUtil.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Struct.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/Type.o  
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/jffi/deprecated.o -lffi   
 [exec] make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
 [exec] cc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mimpure-text'
 [exec] make[1]: *** [/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/jni/libjffi-1.0.so] Error 1

BUILD FAILED
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/custom-build.xml:125: exec returned: 2

Total time: 21 seconds
make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: jffi
Source-Version: 1.0.2-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jffi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.debian.tar.gz
jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
  to main/j/jffi/jffi_1.0.2-9.dsc
libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-java_1.0.2-9_all.deb
libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb
  to main/j/jffi/libjffi-jni_1.0.2-9_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 667...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org (supplier of updated jffi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:48:31 -0700
Source: jffi
Binary: libjffi-java libjffi-jni
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.2-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: 

Processing of tomcat7_7.0.26-4_amd64.changes

2012-05-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tomcat7_7.0.26-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
  tomcat7_7.0.26-4.debian.tar.gz
  tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


tomcat7_7.0.26-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-05-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb
libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7_7.0.26-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4.debian.tar.gz
tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb


Changes:
tomcat7 (7.0.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
  * Address regression leaving ROOT webapp files after purge.
(Closes: #670440)
  * Update copyright year in javadoc to 2012.


Override entries for your package:
libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional doc
libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional doc
tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java
tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc - source java
tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 670440 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.


Bug#670440: marked as done (tomcat7: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8))

2012-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 May 2012 05:32:37 +
with message-id e1szxzx-ay...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#670440: fixed in tomcat7 7.0.26-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #670440,
regarding tomcat7: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
670440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: tomcat7
Version: 7.0.26-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):

http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails

Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean archive is a release
goal since lenny.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

1m11.9s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/authbind/ not owned
  /etc/authbind/byuid/   not owned
  /var/lib/tomcat7/  owned by: tomcat7
  /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/  owned by: tomcat7
  /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/ not owned
  /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/META-INF/not owned
  /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/META-INF/context.xml not owned
  /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps/ROOT/index.html   not owned

/etc/authbind/byuid/ could be handled by dpkg if the package would ship
an empty directory.

cheers,

Andreas


tomcat7_7.0.26-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: tomcat7
Source-Version: 7.0.26-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tomcat7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libservlet3.0-java-doc_7.0.26-4_all.deb
libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libservlet3.0-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/libtomcat7-java_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-admin_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-common_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-docs_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-examples_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7-user_7.0.26-4_all.deb
tomcat7_7.0.26-4.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4.debian.tar.gz
tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb
  to main/t/tomcat7/tomcat7_7.0.26-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 670...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org (supplier of updated tomcat7 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:45:07 -0700
Source: tomcat7
Binary: tomcat7-common tomcat7 tomcat7-user libtomcat7-java libservlet3.0-java 
libservlet3.0-java-doc tomcat7-admin tomcat7-examples tomcat7-docs
Architecture: source all
Version: 7.0.26-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org
Description: 
 libservlet3.0-java - Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2 Java API classes
 libservlet3.0-java-doc - Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2 Java API documentation
 libtomcat7-java - Servlet and JSP engine -- core libraries
 tomcat7- Servlet and JSP engine
 tomcat7-admin - Servlet and JSP engine -- admin web applications
 tomcat7-common - Servlet and JSP engine -- common files
 tomcat7-docs - Servlet and JSP engine -- documentation
 tomcat7-examples - Servlet and JSP engine -- example web applications
 tomcat7-user - Servlet and JSP engine -- tools to create user instances
Closes: 670440
Changes: 
 tomcat7 (7.0.26-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Address regression leaving ROOT webapp files after purge.
 (Closes: #670440)
   * Update copyright year in javadoc to 2012.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 04eaa732cdda88394ac511ac3059625c7a2554f3 2532 tomcat7_7.0.26-4.dsc
 

Bug#608286: CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default

2012-05-30 Thread tony mancill
On 05/30/2012 05:30 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
 severity 608286 minor
 thanks
 
 httpOnly has been made the default in Tomcat 7, so this ID is
 essentially about an insecure default setting.

 For Tomcat 6 I don't esee the need to change the default (which might
 even break applications). Instead such settings should be taken into
 account when setting up a Tomcat site.

 For Squeeze you add a README.Debian or such pointing to the option
 and the recommendation to use the option?
 
 I don't think we can update the Squeeze README for this anymore.
 
 A note could be added to the sid version of tomcat6.
 
 However, this is not a vulnerability, only extra hardening which is surely
 useful but not a vulnerability in itself. I'm therefore downgrading this
 bug to minor: the request to update the README.Debian.

Thank you for looking into this bug.  I shouldn't have let this one go
for so long, but honestly, I'm not sure about the text to add to the
package readme.

Can you propose appropriate wording to add to README.Debian.  Would it
be sufficient to reference the CVE and include a link (say, to [1])?

Thank you,
tony

[1] http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/514866/100/0/threaded





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.