Processing of libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes

libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libphonenumber6-dev_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber6_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.deb libphonenumber6-java_6.2~svn665-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

libphonenumber6-dev_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.deb: trying to install to new, but could not find source === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of

Processing of libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes

libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1.dsc libphonenumber_6.2~svn665.orig.tar.bz2 libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1.debian.tar.gz libphonenumber6-dev_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.deb

libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libphonenumber6-dev is NEW. binary:libphonenumber6 is NEW. binary:libphonenumber6-java is NEW. source:libphonenumber is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP

stringtemplate 3.2.1-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the stringtemplate source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.2.1-1 Current version: 3.2.1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

Processing of rhino_1.7R4-3_amd64.changes

rhino_1.7R4-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rhino_1.7R4-3_all.deb librhino-java_1.7R4-3_all.deb rhino-doc_1.7R4-3_all.deb librhino-java-doc_1.7R4-3_all.deb rhino_1.7R4-3.dsc rhino_1.7R4-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue

Re: Comments regarding libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Hi, On 30/05/14 18:33, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi Matthew, I marked your package for accept now, but please take care of: W: libowasp-antisamy-java: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file I've pushed a fix for this, but it doesn't seem worth minting a new package version for

rhino_1.7R4-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:06:04 +0200 Source: rhino Binary: rhino librhino-java rhino-doc librhino-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.7R4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#741281: marked as done (Updating the rhino Uploaders list)

Your message dated Mon, 02 Jun 2014 17:04:27 + with message-id e1wrvet-0007m5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#741281: fixed in rhino 1.7R4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #741281, regarding Updating the rhino Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

libstruts1.2-java 1.2.9-9 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libstruts1.2-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2.9-8 Current version: 1.2.9-9 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

visualvm 1.3.7-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the visualvm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.3.7-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Bug#750267: jackson-databind: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:jar:debian

Source: jackson-databind Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#750273: stapler: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:jar:debian

Source: stapler Version: 1.218-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): debian/rules

Bug#750279: maven-invoker-plugin: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:jar:debian

Source: maven-invoker-plugin Version: 1.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#750297: sikuli: FTBFS: org/sikuli/ide/extmanager/ExtensionManagerFrame.java:30: error: package org.json.simple does not exist

Source: sikuli Version: 1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-7 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#750303: maven-hpi-plugin: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:jar:debian

Source: maven-hpi-plugin Version: 1.93-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully):

Bug#750309: jenkins-json: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:jar:debian

Source: jenkins-json Version: 2.4-jenkins-3-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140601 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully):

Processing of weupnp_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes

weupnp_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: weupnp_0.1.2-1.dsc weupnp_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz weupnp_0.1.2-1.debian.tar.gz libweupnp-java_0.1.2-1_all.deb libweupnp-java-doc_0.1.2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#750267: Bug introduced with groovy 1.8.6-4

owner 750267 ! owner 750273 ! owner 750279 ! owner 750303 ! owner 750309 ! thanks Hi, I was aware of these bugs but I didn't manage to upload the fixes on time. I'll take care of this. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at

Processed: Bug introduced with groovy 1.8.6-4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 750267 ! Bug #750267 [src:jackson-databind] jackson-databind: FTBFS: Missing required artifact: org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:jar:debian Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org. owner 750273 ! Bug #750273 [src:stapler] stapler:

weupnp_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libweupnp-java is NEW. binary:libweupnp-java-doc is NEW. source:weupnp is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be

Processing of eclipse-ptp_7.0.4-1_amd64.changes

eclipse-ptp_7.0.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: eclipse-ptp-rdt_7.0.4-1_all.deb eclipse-ptp_7.0.4-1.dsc eclipse-ptp_7.0.4.orig.tar.xz eclipse-ptp_7.0.4-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

eclipse-ptp_7.0.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:16:11 +0200 Source: eclipse-ptp Binary: eclipse-ptp-rdt Architecture: source all Version: 7.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers