Processing of stringtemplate4_4.0.6-1_amd64.changes
stringtemplate4_4.0.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: stringtemplate4_4.0.6-1.dsc stringtemplate4_4.0.6.orig.tar.gz stringtemplate4_4.0.6-1.debian.tar.xz libstringtemplate4-java_4.0.6-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
stringtemplate4_4.0.6-1_amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libstringtemplate4-java is NEW. source:stringtemplate4 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel free to browse the NEW queue[1]. If there is an issue with the upload, you will recieve an email from a member of the ftpteam. If you have any questions, you may reply to this email. [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#792670: androidsdk-ddms: android sdk license appears to violate debian charter
hi emmanuel, dr stallman investigated and has this to point out: The Google SDK license contains this text 3.5 Use, reproduction and distribution of components of the SDK licensed under an open source software license are governed solely by the terms of that open source software license and not this License Agreement. Since (as far as we know) all free software is open source, this has the effect of withdrawing all their conditions from the SDK components that are free. They are not violating the GNU GPL. Of course, the rest of their SDK is unethical because it is nonfree, and people should not accept their conditions. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
plexus-cipher 1.7-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the plexus-cipher source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.5-4 Current version: 1.7-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#792175: Batik 1.8 is out, but incompatible!
Unfortunately, Batik 1.8 appears to be incomatible to Batik 1.7 Therefore, upgrading the package without bumping the name will cause many applications to break. E.g. for ELKI I had to limit Batik to the latest 1.7 version in the pom. See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-batik-users/201503.mbox/%3c55157c80.4030...@ptc.com%3E Please consider: - careful testing of packages that depend on Batik - either bouncing the package name of batik, - or setting up appropriate Breaks dependencies It seems that upgrading to 1.8 should not be hard, but since a class was moved to a different package, it may require touching every package that depends on Batik. I'm not a big fan of keeping around many older versions, so maybe setting versioned Breaks: for those 15-16 packages that depend on batik, and working with the affected maintainers to provide packages working with Batik 1.8 instead, is an alternative to ensure a smooth upgrade? Regards, Erich __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#791992: gluegen2: New upstream available
Brief update... I have 2.3.1 packaged, but there will need to be some porting of scilab to work with the newer version, and I think an update of libjogl2-java also. I may upload gluegen2 to experimental if folks think that's useful. Otherwise, I'll upload once libjogl2-java and scilab are ready. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
