fop 1:2.1-6 MIGRATED to testing

2017-05-26 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the fop source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:2.1-5 Current version: 1:2.1-6 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

Bug#654064: marked as done (Updating the libgnuinet-java Uploaders list)

2017-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2017 04:16:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#863235: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #654064, regarding Updating the libgnuinet-java Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means

Bug#703830: marked as done (libgnuinet-java: Typo in package description: "applictions")

2017-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 27 May 2017 04:16:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#863235: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #703830, regarding libgnuinet-java: Typo in package description: "applictions" to be marked as

Bug#863235: Removed package(s) from unstable

2017-05-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libgnuinet-java |1.1.2-2 | source, all --- Reason --- ROM; no longer used -- Note that the package(s) have

Bug#863235: Removed package(s) from unstable

2017-05-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 1.1.2-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libgnuinet-java has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see

Bug#863234: Removed package(s) from unstable

2017-05-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libgnumail-java | 1.1.2-10 | source, all libgnumail-java-doc | 1.1.2-10 | all --- Reason --- ROM; no longer used, replaced by libmail-java

reproducible.debian.net status changes for commons-beanutils

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 23:23 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/commons-beanutils changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

reproducible.debian.net status changes for boilerpipe

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 23:02 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/boilerpipe changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

reproducible.debian.net status changes for akuma

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 22:46 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/akuma changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org

reproducible.debian.net status changes for commons-pool

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 23:24 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/commons-pool changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

reproducible.debian.net status changes for felix-main

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 23:49 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/felix-main changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

reproducible.debian.net status changes for plexus-compiler

2017-05-26 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2017-05-26 15:39 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/plexus-compiler changed from unreproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

pedantic-clojure_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-05-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Fri 26 20:39 < ehashman> turns out that you can REJECT pedantic again; upstream is going to vendor it as it's no longer maintained === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.