Bug#888081: resteasy FTBFS: org.jboss.resteasy.specimpl.ResponseBuilderImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method status(int, java.lang.String) in javax.ws.rs.core.Response.ResponseBui

2018-01-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: resteasy Version: 3.1.4-1 Severity: serious Some recent change in unstable makes resteasy FTBFS: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/resteasy.html https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/resteasy.html ... [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : [INFO]

libpdfbox2-java 2.0.8-2 MIGRATED to testing

2018-01-22 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libpdfbox2-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.8-1 Current version: 2.0.8-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

commons-io 2.6-1 MIGRATED to testing

2018-01-22 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the commons-io source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.5-2 Current version: 2.6-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian status changes for svgsalamander

2018-01-22 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2018-01-22 06:49 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/svgsalamander changed from unreproducible -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian status changes for libpdfbox-java

2018-01-22 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2018-01-22 11:15 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/libpdfbox-java changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

Bug#888040: libjcifs-java - Missing maven dependencies

2018-01-22 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 22/01/2018 à 22:17, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I wonder if we should make the dependency optional +1, the dependency should be marked as provided in the pom (debian/jcifs.pom). __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#888040: libjcifs-java - Missing maven dependencies

2018-01-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 22.01.2018 um 21:35 schrieb Yadickson Soto: > Package: libjcifs-java > Version: 1.3.18-3 > Branch: buster (testing) > > > Hi, > > There is a problem if try build a test application with maven > My application use how dependency libjcifs-java > > > Missing: > -- > 1)

Bug#888040: libjcifs-java - Missing maven dependencies

2018-01-22 Thread Yadickson Soto
Package: libjcifs-java Version: 1.3.18-3 Branch: buster (testing) Hi, There is a problem if try build a test application with maven My application use how dependency libjcifs-java Missing: -- 1) javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:debian ... Please, can you fix the dependency issue. Best

Processed: Re: Bug#733586: closure-compiler: new upstream version available

2018-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 886411 by -1 Bug #886411 [wnpp] ITP: node-react -- JavaScript library for building user interfaces 886411 was blocked by: 886404 886411 was blocking: 886215 Added blocking bug(s) of 886411: 733586 -- 733586:

Bug#733586: closure-compiler: new upstream version available

2018-01-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: block 886411 by -1 On Sat, 20 Jan 2018 20:38:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote:> Being more familiar with nodejs packaging, I prefer to go back to > google-closure-compiler-js. But if there is a newer closure-compiler, > it'd make my work a lot easier. > Hi Tony,