Package: libjaxme-java
Version: 0.5.1+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
please package jaxme 0.5.2.
Also, I wonder if the binary package should not be renamed to
libws-jaxme-java, to be consistent with other ws.apache.org packaged
products.
tags 432541 + confirmed
thanks
Hi Lucas,
Le mardi 10 juillet 2007 à 12:10 +, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Package: eclipse-cdt
version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070708
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in
reassign 436177 glibc
forcemerge 434484 436177
thanks
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 10:25:24PM +0200, Manolo Díaz wrote:
I've experienced a similar problem trying to launch freemind
[...]
In my system /usr/bin/java is provided by the package gij-4.1
(version 4.1.1-20).
This problem is known (see
Hi,
Le samedi 18 août 2007 à 19:42 +0100, Chris Lamb a écrit :
There are also similar typographical errors in the following packages. I was
loathed to duplicate or BTS-clone this bug to them.
libgconf-java - GConf bindings for Java
libglade-java - Glade bindings for Java
libglib-java -
retitle 439184 split eclipse-cdt into eclipse-cdt and eclipse-cdt-sdk
thanks
Hello,
thanks for your report and the nice diagram.
I was just trying to install eclipse-cdt from aptitude and discovered
that it
tried to pull in many more packages than needed.
Currently I have
tags 432541 + help
thanks
I'm really stuck with this one.
This eclipse-cdt FTBFS is always reproducible on amd64 and i386; I have
not tried on other platforms.
Trying to build eclipse-cdt leads to:
cd source-tree/org.eclipse.cdt.releng \
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/java -cp
Hello Andrew,
thanks for looking into this.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:15:47PM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Try running the launcher directly:
/usr/bin/eclipse -noSplash -application org.eclipse.ant.antRunner (or
whatever). I think the exit in this case is due to the osgi
configuration
Just another hint on this one: using etch to recompile eclipse-cdt
*does* work. So it's likely a problem in the toolchain.
Regards,
Thomas
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello Andrew,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:55:43AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
Moving from an etch chroot to sid, I was able to find out that the
following upgrades do not impact eclipse-cdt compilation:
* libc6 2.6.1-6
* ant 1.7.0-3
* eclipse 3.2.2-4
This means one of the
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:42:40PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Thomas, please could check with gcj-4.3 (from experimental) / gcc-snapshot?
With:
* gcc-snapshot 20071020-1
* gij-4.3 4.3-20071020-1
I have the same problem; make stops with:
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 13
I'm not
reassign 432541 gcj-4.2
retitle 432541 gcj-4.2 can no longer compile Eclipse plugins
merge 432539 432541
thanks
Hi,
after having slowly updated an etch chroot to a sid one using
snaphsot.debian.net, I have found that the FTBFS occurs with gcj-4.2,
and is not related to ecj.
Indeed, using the
Package: aspectj
Version: 1.5.3-1
Severity: wishlist
A new AspectJ version was released on 12/20/2007.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-amd64 (SMP w/2
Hello,
Le dimanche 20 janvier 2008 à 16:17 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libglib-java-dev_0.4.2-8_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
Le dimanche 20 janvier 2008 à 18:02 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libcairo-java-dev_1.0.8-7_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either
Package: libgtk-java
Version: 2.10.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
This is the same kind of bug as #462500 and #462506.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 17:12 +0100, Michael Koch a écrit :
I have just tried this with SUN JDK 6, Icedtea, gcj 4.3, jamvm and cacao
with the following result:
SUN JDK 6: Just works.
gcj-4.3: No output at all. Returns with exit code 13.
icedtea: No output at all. Returns with exit
Hello,
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 23:32 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libvte-java-dev_0.12.3-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 15:02 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgtk-java-dev_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 16:02 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgconf-java-dev_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 18:17 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libglade-java-dev_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
Le samedi 26 janvier 2008 à 19:02 +, Debian Installer a écrit :
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgnome-java-dev_2.12.7-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says devel.
Either the
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote:
Using the following pakages:
* java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2
* ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1
* libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3
* gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3
* gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1, libgcj7-1 4.1.2-16
Hello dann,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:00:30AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem that is likely to
cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a
pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64.
forwarded 476295 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528282
thanks
Hello,
this bug was forwarded upstream.
Regards,
Thomas
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello Laszlo,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:16:27PM +0100, Laszlo wrote:
If I select a string (function), right click on it, and open
declaration(F3), or open definition(Ctrl-F3), eclipse just quit.
(Im in C/C++ perspective)
I've just tried to reproduce the bug you mentioned a while ago on my
Hello Andreas,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:28:45PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
the CDT source Feature is reported as broken under Help-Software
Updates-Manage Configuration. The status is
Plug-in org.eclipse.cdt.source version 3.0.1 referenced by this feature
is missing.
Thanks for
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 04:42:06PM +0200, xavier hubert wrote:
While adding an external include path in a standard C project, an error
occurs :
An error occured while setting the project path
See error log for more details
I have just tried to reproduce this with eclipse-cdt 3.1.2-1
Hello,
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:49:24AM +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
I think aspectj is suitable for main, unless I missed
something. Please upload it at the next opportunity. (By the way,
1.6.0 has been released.)
AspectJ does compile with gcj and run with gij. But the testsuite has
many
Hello,
Le mercredi 07 mai 2008 à 07:49 +0200, Michael Koch a écrit :
sparc is not officially supported by Eclipse. What we did in the eclipse
package is to copy the native parts from another arch. Apply some sed
magic to rename packages, etc. and build the result. This should be
possible with
found 432541
tags 432541 - confirmed help
close 432541
thanks
That bug got fixed with the gcc-4.3/4.3.0-2 upload.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
tags 480132 + help
thanks
Le lundi 12 mai 2008 à 06:47 +0200, Marcus Better a écrit :
AspectJ does compile with gcj and run with gij. But the testsuite has
many failures when launched with gij; that's why aspectj is in contrib.
Oh. Can we upload it to main nevertheless with disabled
tags 384507 + patch
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:14:47PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
dpkg-source: extracting libnsuml-java in libnsuml-java-0.4.20
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is libnsuml-java
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.4.20-12
dpkg-buildpackage: host
tags 420052 + confirmed pending
thanks
Hello Lucas,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:01:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: libgtk-java
Version: 2.8.5-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000 rebuild
Hi,
During a
Hello Kurt,
thanks for reporting:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:30:42PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: libglib-jni
Version: 0.4.2-6
Severity: serious
The /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-java.pc file says:
Requires: glib-2.0 gobject-2.0
So you need a Depends on libglib2.0-dev which provided
reassign 423843 libgtk-java
tag 423843 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:53:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: libgconf-java
Version: 2.12.6-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of libgconf-java_2.12.6-2 on
35 matches
Mail list logo
