it this issue during "buster" development
> cycle.
Sure. I'd suggest coming to the next ruby sprint, whenever that will
be. Discussing the correct dependencies is a lot easier with a
whiteboard.
Cheers,
--
christian hofstaedtler
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Ja
s with Multi-Arch: foreign and that
> tracker.d.o will tell you where (e.g. ruby-rd).
Noted. A number of dependency cycles would also go away, I imagine.
** Plus, ruby-interpreter serves as an escape hatch for
bootstrapping rubyX.Y on new archs.
*** This is done using code in dh_ruby.
Best,
--
,
jruby should simply drop the provides.
I do not think it is feasible today to ship a ruby implementation
that provides ruby-interpreter without (some form of) support in
gem2deb.
Best is probably to just drop the Provides in jruby.
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debi
e: /usr/bin/ruby: bad interpreter: No such file or
> directory
This is clearly jruby violating its advertisement of
ruby-interpreter. Reassigning.
Thanks,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E0
)
ruby-extlib
ruby-stomp (U)
ruby-systemu (U)
stompserver (U)
Cajus Pollmeier
qpid-cpp
Carl Worth
notmuch
ruby-mail (U)
ruby-treetop (U)
Carlos Zuferri
live-manual (U)
Christian Hofstaedtler
bundler (U)
gist (U)
ruby-docile (U)
ruby-mechanize (U)
-
Please help fixing the FindRuby macro in cmake (see #730095), or any
of the existing FTBFS bugs:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby-defaults-2.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Where to get help
-
Please see https://wiki.debia
n.
Please change your package to use Ruby 1.9 or 2.0. The "ruby"
metapackage depends on the current default interpreter version.
Thanks,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
`-
__
Th
7 matches
Mail list logo