Package: libsejda-java
Version: 3.2.38-1
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
according to https://github.com/torakiki/sejda/wiki/Getting-Started
sejda comes with a console for command line use, and I would have
expected this in this package, or in a separate
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 11.07.2015, 23:52 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
Anyways, can you fix this in sid and testing, then maybe we can
have it
in jessie-backports?
Fixed in sid.
thanks!
I'll request
Dear fop-maintainers,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:34:33 +0100 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote:
Seems like #655027 is back. Steps from debian/jessis amd64 (today):
[..]
the problem seems to be that /usr/share/fop/fop-hyph.jar is empty.
sid:
$ aunpack -l /usr/share/fop/fop-hyph.jar
Archive:
Dear Maintainers of fop, ant, maven-repo-helper,
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java and xmlgraphics-commons,
I’d like to backport fop to sequeeze, and I successfully built it on
sequeeze after also backporting the packages mentioned above. No source
changes were required besides these two changes
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 18:47 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Dear Maintainers of fop, ant, maven-repo-helper,
libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java and xmlgraphics-commons,
I’d like to backport fop to sequeeze
Dear Ludovic,
Am Samstag, den 11.02.2012, 00:36 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Claude:
It looks like either src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/resolver/ is
missing from your source tarball (are you using the correct tarball for
ant 1.8.2?)
it’s there, the source tarball was obtained with apt-get
: source package ant
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.8.2-4~bpo60+1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
dpkg-source --before-build ant-1.8.2
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
fakeroot debian/rules clean
test -x debian/rules
dh_testroot
dh_clean
rm
Hi Mathieu,
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2012, 16:51 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’ll commit it later today (if it turns out that I have write
permission).
ok, one day later, but its in now.
When is an upload planned?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome
Hi,
Am Montag, den 09.01.2012, 21:05 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2012, 16:51 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’ll commit it later today (if it turns out that I have write
permission).
ok, one day later, but its in now.
I spoke too early; looks like I don’t have
, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 07.01.2012, 23:43 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I'd propse this course of action:
* Manually fetch offo-hyphenation_v2.0.zip from
http://offo.sourceforge.net/hyphenation/index.html and put
Package: fop
Version: 1:1.0.dfsg2-5
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have brought up the issue of fop hyphenation patterns before, but it
did not lead anywhere yet, so I’d like to open a bug report to track the
status. The relevant mails are:
Hi FOP maintainers,
FOP does not ship hyphenation patterns due to perceived license problems
by upstream¹. On the other hand, Debian ships at least some hyphenation
patterns in the texlive-base package, so it seems that we do not see a
problem here.
If that is the case we should ship a fop
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 13:21 +0200 schrieb Vincent Fourmond:
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
I’m bitten by this bug on a debian lenny+backports installation. And I
really want to avoid installing software from experimental
Hi,
I’m bitten by this bug on a debian lenny+backports installation. And I
really want to avoid installing software from experimental... :-)
Any chance that this bug fix can be backported to squeeze?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ#
[Re-sent, as the adresses in the CC were wrong]
Hi,
just FYI, as I need an updated fop package on a lenny installation, I
backported fop and the required dependencies batik, xml-commons-external
and xmlgraphics-commons. All build without problems using lenny
packages.
I will upload them to
Hi Debian XML group,
I have trouble getting fop to use the Debian XML catalog, as specified
on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512443.
Unfortunately, the maintainer did not respond. Maybe you can help here?
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
Package: fop
Version: 1:0.95.dfsg-4
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
/usr/share/doc/fop/README.Debian talks about Jimi and JAI support which,
according to http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/graphics.html, is no
longer included in 0.94 and later. Also, it
Package: fop
Version: 1:0.95.dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I tried to make fop (the “binary”) to use the locally installed DTDs for
docbook, but I could not find out how.
I installed libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java, but I only could find
HI,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2008, 22:41 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
I have hit this problem, and it seems it can be solved by libsaxon-java
– at least that made it go away here, and the pictures appeared.
I don’t know the exacts how and why, but (at least) the png files were
Package: icedtea-gcjwebplugin
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
trying to use the java plugin here:
http://java.sun.com/applets/jdk/1.4/demo/applets/Fractal/example1.html
(and with other applets from this site) it crashes, and this seems to be
the
20 matches
Mail list logo
