maven-shade-plugin_1.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, the files src/it/duplicate-classes-with-reloc/repo/org/apache/maven/its/shade/dcwr/a/0.1/a-0.1.jar src/it/duplicate-classes-with-reloc/repo/org/apache/maven/its/shade/dcwr/b/0.1/b-0.1.jar

maven-install-plugin_2.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: src/test/resources contains several .jar files (e.g. unit/install-file-with-pomFile-test/target/maven-install-test-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar) containing Test.class for which the source seems to be missing. -- bye Joerg === Please feel free to respond to this email if you

plexus-digest_1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, source for org/codehaus/plexus/redback/authorization/open/OpenAuthorizer.class in src/test/examples/redback-authz-open.jar is missing -- bye Joerg === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload

netbeans-cvsclient_6.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: missing copyright info: src/org/netbeans/lib/cvsclient/file/FileHandler.java * The Initial Developer of the Original Software is Robert Greig. * Portions created by Robert Greig are Copyright (C) 2000. And a minor issue: debian/pom.xml still mentions Sun Public License

jajuk_1.8~svn4764-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, sorry, but Tango Icons used in this project are released under the CREATIVE COMMONS PUBLIC LICENSE, Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5. is a non-free license. Starting from version 3.0 its ok for main, before that it just doesnt work out. -- bye Joerg === Please

libxsd2jibx-java_0.0.0beta2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, i dont believe your debian/copyright file statement about the license. Only one file in the tarball has a header stating the same, the others dont have any. There is no extra file describing the license. AND docs/index.html contains Licensed to the JiBX Project for free

Comments regarding maven-debian-helper_0.1_i386.changes

Hi Maintainer, ganneff.sh - # This horror script is used to bootstrap maven-debian-helper. *sigh* Be sure to never have to ask for any kind of favor. -- bye Joerg ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

surefire_2.4.3-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: Many of the source files contain this: * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file * distributed with this work for additional information * regarding copyright ownership. only NOTICE

surefire_2.4.3-1_i386.changes REJECTED

pleae see -2 reject === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

maven-debian-helper_0.1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, various issues. The copyright file misses Copyright (c) 2003 Stefan Gybas sgy...@debian.org on 2 files: cdbs/maven.mk, cdbs/maven-vars.mk Also, this package really makes on shudder. Build-Depending on oneself is almost always wrong and to be avoided. Please, either

vecmath_1.5.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright points to the GPL symlink, but you have files licensed as GPLv2 only, ie. not with the or any later option. As the GPL symlink points to GPLv3 your copyright file is wrong. Please fix. Also, you ant to mention the Classpath exception. And your

java3d_0.0.cvs.20081104-1_i386.changes REJECTED

see -2 reject === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

plexus-containers_1.0~beta2-2_i386.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

plexus-containers_1.0~beta2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

jftp_1.51~pre4-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, please include the orig tarball in uploads moving contrib-main. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

antlr_2.7.7-7_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected. E: antlr-gcj: no-copyright-file Its missing the whole usr/share/doc part. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

electric_8.07-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, two things: a.)W: electric source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: electric source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 8.07-1 W: electric source: no-human-maintainers You really want to set an Uploaders field with some data. b.) You want to fix

lucene2_2.3.2+ds1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, B-D on contrib package, can't go to main: libdb-je-java (=3.2.68). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

jaranalyzer_1.2-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, you miss to mention the different license/copyright for the jaranalyzer.xsl file. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

icedtea-gcjwebplugin_1.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, if you dont want to lose the source tarball during a contrib/main move you should include it. And no, you dont want to lose it. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

icedtea-gcjwebplugin_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, not for main right now (missing openjdk) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

statsvn_0.3.1.dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi You are moving from contrib to main - please make sure to include the upstream source tarball in this move, using -sa flag when building the package. Otherwise the source goes missing. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires

Comments regarding jbossas4_4.2.2.GA-3_i386.changes

Hi Maintainer, this sucks: Description: jbossas4 - JBoss System libjboss-aspects-java - JBoss System libjboss-cluster-java - JBoss System libjboss-connector-java - JBoss System libjboss-deployment-java - JBoss System libjboss-ejb3-java - JBoss System libjboss-ejb3x-java - JBoss System

antlr3_3.0.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, i think we miss the source for the dlls in the runtime/CSharp directory. If not, please point me at them. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Re: asm override disparity

On 11301 March 1977, Michael Koch wrote: libasm-java-doc_1.5.3-5_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says devel. -doc packages should be in doc section alicia libasm-java-doc doc Yes. -- bye Joerg Paris Hilton is a woman? Not a hotel? This thread gets more surreal with every

java-wrappers_0.1.1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, sorry, your debian/copyright misses the pointer to the full text of the license. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

cdk_1.0.1.91-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

weil da was GPL-maessifes drin ist, was nicht drin sein darf === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Re: glib-java override disparity

On 11270 March 1977, Thomas Girard wrote: libglib-java-dev is now in libdevel -- bye Joerg aj vorlon: would it be less subtle if we replaced red, green and yellow with black, white and a shade of grey? vorlon aj: and this is what a necrotic port looks like? aj vorlon: the arch

Re: cairo-java override disparity

On 11270 March 1977, Thomas Girard wrote: The libcairo-java-dev contains symlinks, .pc file and headers. Therefore I feel it belongs to the libdevel section, despite the fact it's related to a Java package. Moved -- bye Joerg [...] While Debian is certainly about beer, and in some cases may

Re: libgtk-java override disparity

On 11277 March 1977, Thomas Girard wrote: libgtk-java-dev_2.10.2-6_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. libgconf-java-dev_2.12.6-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says devel. libglade-java-dev_2.12.8-4_amd64.deb: package says section is

Comments regarding libsaxon-java_6.5.5-3_i386.changes

Hi Maintainer, please ignore this one mail, its just to test a new alioth feature to automatically allow mails from archive (and BTS) to go through. -- bye Joerg ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

please modify the override file to have the section saying 'libs'. libxmlrpc3-client-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says devel. libxmlrpc3-common-java_3.1-1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says devel. libxmlrpc3-server-java_3.1-1_all.deb:

Re: libxmlrpc3-java override disparity

On 11187 March 1977, Michael Koch wrote: Justification: Java libraries, to the difference of C libraries, are at the same time for runtime and development usage. We consider that it makes more sense to put all Java libraries in 'libs' as 85% of them are already in this section (I've

libgdata-java_1.15.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, you should check your build-depends. 2 are contrib, one is non-free... -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

libjson-java_2.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, a B-D on a contrib package (groovy) isnt something a main package wants. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

libpicocontainer-java_1.3-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, please enhance your copyright file. You may want to read http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html for a bit more information. (You are missing the (C) holder). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

libquartz-java_1.6.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, one of your Build-Depends is in contrib, you cant go to main. (glassfish-javaee) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

libjboss-remoting-java_2.2.0.GA-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, one of the build-depends (libjboss-serialization-java) is not in main, you need to go to contrib. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

libcobra-java_0.97.2-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, please make sure to include the .orig tarball in an upload where you move from one suite to another. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

libswarmcache-java_1.0RC2+cvs20071027-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, having libjgroups-java in B-D means you cant go to main. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers

flute-1.3-jfree_20061107-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, I htink your package split didnt work - all documentation ended up in the main package, while the -doc one is empty. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

Comments regarding flutejava_1.3-1_powerpc.changes

Hi Maintainer, i think you want to fix debian/dirs, the two following are unneccessary in your package: drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-10-08 13:55:13 ./usr/bin/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2007-10-08 13:55:13 ./usr/sbin/ -- bye Joerg ___

libpixie-java_0.8.7-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, where is the source for jcommon-1.0.10.jar? -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

javahelp2_2.0.05-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, at least one file does contain a copyright notice that makes it unfit for Debian. @(#)package.html 1.2 10/15/98 Copyright 1998 by Sun Microsystems, Inc., 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, California, 94303, U.S.A. All rights reserved.

ecj_3.3.0+0728-1_i386.changes REJECTED

as requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

jsr107cache_1.0.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright is broken. You may only point to a license if its in /usr/share/common-licenses, in all others cases you have to include the full license text in the copyright file. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

ehcache_1.3.0~beta.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright is broken. You may only point to a license if its in /usr/share/common-licenses, in all others cases you have to include the full license text in the copyright file. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

trove_2.0~a2.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, you want to put the -doc package into contrib too. -- bye JOerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing

jarjar_1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, two errors in your debian/copyright. First: On Debian systems the full text of the Lesser General Public License, LGPL, can be found at /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. Second - you missed to mention that src/main/gnu/getopt/* is LGPL. -- bye Joerg === If you

fop_0.93.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

16:33:08 man-di Ganneff: kannst du bitte fop in der NEW queue rejecten? 16:33:14 man-di reason: wrong section === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

javassist_3.4.dfsg.1-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright file is buggy. You need to link to the full license texts in usr/share/common/licenses (or, if they arent there - include them). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing,

libgtk-java_2.10.2-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, you want to read http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html and fix your debian/copyright file. You currently dont list copyright and what you have below copyright is really the license. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your

libgtk-java_2.10.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

see -2 reject, thank === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

libjazzy-java_0.5.1a-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, Section: main - please select a correct section. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

plexus-utils_1.4.1+svn6048-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, as requested from Michael Koch: Duplicated package. (Outdated) Package called libplexus-utils is already in the archive. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

libjazzy-java_0.5.1-2_powerpc.changes REJECTED

see previous reject please === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

libjazzy-java_0.5.1a-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, in what section do you want this? main is none of them. Also, what you name Copyright in your debian/copyright is the license, not the copyright. Please read http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why

jargs_1.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, the source for contrib, the .deb files for main? I think you missed to either drop contrib/ completly or to set it for the .debs too. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

nekohtml_0.9.5-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright misses information. lib/xercesMinimal.jar is Apache licensed (look into it) and is also distributed without source. Not good. Also the src/ directories contain files under other licenses. You need to list such stuff. -- bye Joerg === If you

libmsv-xsdlib-java_0.0.0.20060319-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, from what I see this doesnt even fit non-free right now. While the BSD license and the Apache thing are fine you also have the file copyright.txt, which you probably meant with goto non-free due to a license problem. But thats written in a form that it doesnt even fit

libmsv-xsdlib-java_0.0.0.20060319-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, please put the -doc package into non-free too, not into contrib. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___

Re: Comments regarding tomcat5.5_5.5.15-1_powerpc.changes

On 10706 March 1977, Michael Koch wrote: I think we can just get rid of tomcat4 now as its totally dead. This way we get rid of another package in contrib too. Good. Then please start that and when the bug is there you get tomcat5.5 Note that you cant just file one bug: jspwiki/contrib has

libjaxp1.3-java_1.3.03-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, your debian/copyright misses information, half of the tarball is not licensed under the ASL. You need to list that. And should you include files under LICENSE.dom-documentation.txt you need to remove them or go into non-free. -- bye Joerg === If you don't

Bug#377168: libbsf-java: Removed (Build-)Depends

Package: libbsf-java Severity: serious Hi One of your (Build-)Depends just got a removal, as it was unmaintained and still depending on the long ago removed python2.1 - jython. Please update your package or reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org for removal if that shouldnt be possible. Sorry. :)

cairo-java_1.0.3-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, you want to visit http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html to see whats missing in your debian/copyright file. (Things like (C) years, and a more verbose license blurb for example) Then also - you list LGPL, which most files have. But there is one

libmsv-xsdlib-java_0.0.0.20060319-1_powerpc.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, this must go to non-free. --- You acknowledge that Software is not designed,licensed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility. --- The word licensed in that sentence makes it non-free, the rest would

cacao_0.93-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, as your debian/copyright misses information. At minimum the whole boehm-gc subdir has a different license, but I stopped searching after I found also fdlibm/mprec.h - its your task to make the copyright file complete. :) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why

lucene_1.4.3-6_i386.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

libstruts1.2-java_1.2.4-2_i386.changes REJECTED

Please upload contrib - main moves *with* the orig.tar.gz included, thanks === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list