Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Tony et al., On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, tony mancill wrote: I was in fact inferring some special (but temporary) dispensation for these packages because my understanding is that it won't be possible to build SBT from source until the entire set of related packages is in the

Re: scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Would it be ok to target non-free instead of main until the even in non-free the debian/copyright has to have the correct contents. bootstrapping is complete and the binaries removed from the source tarballs? Hmm, this will result in sbt being in

scala-tools-sbinary_0.4.2+2.11.M5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Frédér, your package seems to consist mostly of jar files without the corresponding sources. So I am afraid I have to reject it. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

pantomime-clojure_2.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Apollon, please mention Dean Edwards and Sam Stephenson with their mootools license in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __

Comments regarding exec-maven-plugin_1.6.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi Emmanuel, I marked the package for accept, but please mention Google as copyright holder at least for: exec-maven-plugin-1.6.0/src/test/java/org/codehaus/mojo/exec/ThrowingMain.java Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Frederic, I marked your package for accept, but is there a reason for all those bootstrapdeps-entries in your debian/copyright? Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please

freeplane_1.5.11-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Felix, please mention the Open Font License of the Intuitive Font mentioned in: freeplane-1.5.11/freeplane/resources/fonts/intuitive-license.txt in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected,

hdrhistogram_2.1.9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Emmanuel, at least the license of HdrHistogram-HdrHistogram-2.1.9/src/main/csharp/Utilities/AtomicLong.cs seems to be missing in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload

stegosuite_0.7.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Tobias, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the licenses of all files in your debian/copyright. At least the EPL of stegosuite-0.7.2/src/main/java/org/stegosuite/image/util/ImageSwtAwtConverter.java is missing. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond

libjsonp-java_1.0.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, Jitendra Kotamraju doesn't seem to be the copyright holder. According to the file headers it is Oracle. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This

jayway-jsonpath_0.9.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Emmanuel, please mention the license of JsonPath-json-path-0.9.1/json-path/src/test/resources/js/jsonpath-0.8.0.js in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files

asm_5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Emmanuel, please mention at least the licenses of: test/perf/org/aspectj/apache/bcel/classfile/Signature.java test/***/ModifiedPass3bVerifier.java in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were

Comments regarding airlift-slice_0.10-1_amd64.changes

Hi Emmanuel, I marked the package for accept, but you might want to mention "The Guava Authors" in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

Comments regarding java-common_0.54_amd64.changes

Just for the records: to make things easier for everybody, default-java-plugin in experimental will be not installable until Emmanuel uploads icedtea-8-web ... __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding java-common_0.54_amd64.changes

Hi Emmanuel, one of your packages depends on icedtea-8-web. Do you plan to upload this as well? Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org

libphonenumber_7.0.11-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

latest version has been accepted === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

javawriter_2.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As discussed per EMail, please reupload as normal upload ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

cmdreader_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As discussed per EMail, please reupload as normal upload ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

jsap_2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Guillaume, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The file JSAP-2.1/src/doc/manual.xml is licensed under CC 1.0, which is not compatible with DFSG. So please remove that file from the source tarball. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

jsap_2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Guillaume, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The file JSAP-2.1/doc/pr01.html is licensed under CC-BY-SA v1.0. As this license is not compatible with DFSG, please remove this file. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

kryo-serializers_0.22-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Emmanuel, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The file src\test\java\de\javakaffee\kryoserializers\cglib\CustomClassLoader.java doesn't seem to be distributable. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if

libzeus-jscl-java_1.72-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, please take care of src/gr/zeus/res/eclipse-icons-license.txt Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of

plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

jackson-dataformat-xml_2.5.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Markus, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The copyright holder of: jackson-dataformat-xml-jackson-dataformat-xml-2.5.3\src\test\java\com\fasterxml\jackson\dataformat\xml\failing\Issue97Test.java is Nu Echo Inc. They don't appear in any other file and give no license information

plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Miguel, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Your debian/copyright says that alle files are under Apache-2.0 and MIT. According to the file headers, this seems to be wrong. Some files are under MIT and some files are under Apache-2.0, but no file is under both licenses. Thorsten

Comments regarding jnr-ffi_1.0.10-1_amd64.changes

Hi Tim, I marked your package for accept, but src/test/* from your debian/copyright seems to be src/libtest/* now. Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use

jnr-constants_0.8.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of at least: src/main/java/jnr/constants/Platform.java src/main/java/jnr/constants/Constant.java src/main/java/jnr/constants/ConstantSet.java

Bug#767101: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: sikulix Version: 1.1.0~beta4-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing license of: Tesseract4SikuliX/src/main/java/org/sikuli/tesseract/TessAPI.java

eclipse-pydev_3.8.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses/copyright holder of: plugins/org.python.pydev/src/org/python/pydev/editor/preferences/PydevEditorPrefs.java

fastinfoset_1.2.12-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, almost done, the file xmldsig-core-schema.xsd is not under ASL but W3C Software License. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer

fasterxml-oss-parent_16-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by Timo === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

jackson-parent_2.4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by Timo === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libjavamail-api-java_1.5.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding clojure1.6_1.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but your debian/copyright seems to miss an entry for Files: *. Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use

fastinfoset_1.2.12-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Files in fastinfoset/pkg/SUNWfastinfoset/* contain a statement: # Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. # Use is subject to license terms. (maybe there are other files as well) Please mention these license

libphonenumber_6.3~svn680-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

not in changelog, so gone with the wind ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libphonenumber_6.2~svn671-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Daniel, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of (and maybe others): libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\basictypes.h libphonenumber\cpp\src\phonenumbers\base\memory\scoped_ptr.h

libphonenumber_6.2~svn665-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as newer version === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#755794: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: jakarta-jmeter Version: 2.11-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of: src/core/org/apache/jmeter/images/warning.png

Bug#755794: missing license in debian/copyright

Hi Tony, On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, tony mancill wrote: I'm confused by this bug report. There are 391 .png files in the source package, and 61 alone in the ./src/ tree, and debian/copyright documents all of these files as having the Apache-2.0 license: yep, but this seems to be wrong ... Is

apache-log4j2_2.0~beta9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of ./src/site/resources/js/jquery.js ./src/site/resources/js/jquery.min.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

Re: xsom_0+20110809-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote: Actually, all package.html that I can find do have that header but in html comment format.. did you mean some other files and if so, which ones? Ooops, sorry, I meant those files, but the file viewer stripped the html comment here. So only

Comments regarding weupnp_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes

Hi Daniel, I marked your package for accept. According to the file headers the software is licensed under LGPL-2.1+. Maybe you want to add the + to your debian/coypright. Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Re: xsom_0+20110809-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Timo, On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Timo Aaltonen wrote: The file header also says: # When distributing the software, include this License Header Notice in each # file and include the License file at packager/legal/LICENSE.txt. Well, to me it sounds like that path is just wrong and it attempts to

xsom_0+20110809-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to your GPL-2 license block in debian/copyright, the software is licensed under: either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This seems to be wrong as the file header says GPL-2 only. The file

libvt-ldap-java_3.3.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libopenws-java_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libopensaml2-java_2.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libopensaml2-java_2.6.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libxmltooling-java_1.4.2-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libshib-common-java_1.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

source tarball contains .svn cruft thanks for reuploading without this === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding libnu-htmlparser-java_1.4-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, the license of some files says that: You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document. Can you please explain why Debian is allowed to distribute these files? Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Re: Comments regarding libnu-htmlparser-java_1.4-1_amd64.changes

Hi Emmanuel, On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 12/06/2014 14:18, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit : the license of some files says that: You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document. Can you please explain why Debian is allowed to distribute

Comments regarding libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Hi Matthew, I marked your package for accept now, but please take care of: W: libowasp-antisamy-java: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file Thanks! Thorsten __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

libowasp-esapi-java_2.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, please revise the debian/copyright of your package. For example src/test/resources/log4j.dtd is licensed under Apache-2, which is not mentioned in debian/coypright. There might be other licenses missing! Do you really want to dirstribute all those .svn-directories in the

libowasp-antisamy-java_1.5.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Some js-files are licensed under MIT, GPL or Apache-2. These licenses are not mentioned in debian/copyright. Please also remove all minified js-files where no sources are provided. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to

Bug#741419: missing license in debian/copyright

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Markus Koschany wrote: The whole bug report is bean counting. There is either a problem with wrong licenses and a policy violation or not. Please take a closer took at those files. None of them is licensed under the Apache license. It is completely absurd what you are

Bug#741419: missing license in debian/copyright

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 12/03/2014 12:37, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit : please add the missing licenses of: jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\contrib\src\resources\hamlet.xml jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\package\META-INF\jdom-info.xml jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\samples\* (some of them) jdom-JDOM

Bug#741419: missing license in debian/copyright

Hi Markus, On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Markus Koschany wrote: please add the missing licenses of: jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\contrib\src\resources\hamlet.xml The text was placed in the public domain hence it is not subject to any copyright and upstream is allowed to put this file under the same license as

Bug#741419: missing license in debian/copyright

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Markus Koschany wrote: I disagree with your assumptions of the term public domain. The whole reason for granting a work to the public domain is to waive any form of copyright. Public domain works can also be freely used in derivative works, non-free or free. By creating

Comments regarding gmetric4j_1.0.6-2_amd64.changes

Ok, I found it ... __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

dtd-parser_1.2~svn20110404-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing BSD license of some *.xml to debian/copyright. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our