java-package: for jdk provide alternative to bin/java rather than jre/bin/java

since for some reason my reportbug sumission seems not to go through (at least i never get a confirmation), below the text again Subject: java-package: for jdk provide alternative to bin/java rather than jre/bin/java Package: java-package Version: 0.53 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, when

Bug#691063: java-package: generate package needs more provides

Package: java-package Version: 0.50+nmu1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, after generating a java6 package from 6.0.37 (oracle-j2sdk1.6_1.6.0+update37_amd64.deb) I attempted to remove the old sun* packages and the never used and only by force installed openjdk* packages (I don't care if

Bug#691063: Acknowledgement (java-package: generate package needs more provides)

well, never mind. didn't realize that ~exp1 means it's in experimental and not yet in sid. but, latexdraw depends on sun-java6-jre which is not in Provides. is sun-java6-jre supposed to go? but as long as a default package like latexdraw (and maybe others) require that, java-package should

Bug#476286: libjdom1-java: apidoc incompatible format

i filed a bug against eclipse (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226514) and given the fact that gjdoc claims to be compatible to javadoc up to and including version 1.4, the question araises wether gjdoc or eclipse do have a compatibility issue -- because docs generated w/