Bug#793860: findbugs: Please consider depending on default-jre | java5-runtime

2015-07-29 Thread tony mancill
On 07/28/2015 02:27 AM, Rogério Brito wrote:
 Package: findbugs
 Version: 2.0.3+repack-1
 Severity: wishlist
 
 Dear Java maintainers,
 
 I would like to get some other virtual machines installed on my system
 (e.g., the one from Oracle or have only openjdk-8---or openjdk-9 if I'm
 feeling adventurous) and it would be super nice to have one of those fulfill
 the dependencies that default-jre provides.

Hi Rogério,

Depending on the default-jre or the minimum runtime makes good sense to
me, and seems like a generally useful best practice.

Thanks for the bug report!
Cheers,
tony




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#793860: findbugs: Please consider depending on default-jre | java5-runtime

2015-07-28 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: findbugs
Version: 2.0.3+repack-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear Java maintainers,

I would like to get some other virtual machines installed on my system
(e.g., the one from Oracle or have only openjdk-8---or openjdk-9 if I'm
feeling adventurous) and it would be super nice to have one of those fulfill
the dependencies that default-jre provides.

I know that (in part) the effect can be achieved via the alternative system,
but I think that having the alternative specified serves more than one purpose:

* From a minimalistic POV, it allows the user to have only one runtime
  installed.
* From a version requirement POV, having java5-runtime (or 6 or 7...) states
  clearly what is the minimum runtime version that the program requires.

There are probably many other reasons to relax the strict requirement of
default-jre (which, BTW, is a moving target), but those are the first ones
that come to my mind.

Since this bug report is quite adventurous, I can perfectly understand it
if you think that a wontfix is suitable. :)


Thanks for your amazing work maintaining the Java packages,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages findbugs depends on:
ii  default-jre   2:1.7-52
ii  java-wrappers 0.1.28
ii  junit44.12-2
ii  libasm3-java  3.3.2-2
ii  libcommons-lang-java  2.6-5
ii  libdom4j-java 1.6.1+dfsg.3-2
ii  libfindbugs-bcel-java 6.0~rc3-1
ii  libjaxen-java 1.1.6-1
ii  libjcip-annotations-java  20060626-5
ii  libjdepend-java   2.9.1-1
ii  libjformatstring-java 0.10~20131207-1
ii  libjsr305-java0.1~+svn49-8

findbugs recommends no packages.

findbugs suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFC
http://cynic.cc/blog/ : github.com/rbrito : profiles.google.com/rbrito
DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br

__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.