Bug#837489: Only a binNMU is required

2016-10-25 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 25/10/2016 à 15:22, tony mancill a écrit : > Also, I would like to get > the package out of SVN (in fact, that has been the hold-up on the > upload, since the migrate script the Java team normally uses fails to > migrate this package - I'm ready to "gbp import-dscs --debsnap antlr" > and call

Bug#837489: Only a binNMU is required

2016-10-25 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:22:36AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: >> Hi Adrian, > > Hi Tony, > >> Balint requested that the antlr package drop the separate >> libantlr-pic.a and the non-PIC libantlr.a currently shipped. This >>

Bug#837489: Only a binNMU is required

2016-10-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 06:22:36AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi Tony, > Balint requested that the antlr package drop the separate > libantlr-pic.a and the non-PIC libantlr.a currently shipped. This > requires a change to debian/rules, and so is sourceful. >... what Balint wanted

Bug#837489: Only a binNMU is required

2016-10-25 Thread tony mancill
Hi Adrian, Balint requested that the antlr package drop the separate libantlr-pic.a and the non-PIC libantlr.a currently shipped. This requires a change to debian/rules, and so is sourceful. The discussion is included in this bug report. Also, I would like to get the package out of SVN (in

Bug#837489: Only a binNMU is required

2016-10-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: retitle -1 antlr needs PIE binNMU A binNMU is sufficient to fix this, and already requested. Policy does not permit building normal static libraries with PIC unless there is a special reason hat has been discussed on debian-devel. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?"