Le 5/07/2017 à 13:07, Erich Schubert a écrit :
> To me, these appear to be obvious typos; independent of whether you can
> reproduce them, or not...
This was changed by upstream in the latest version:
https://github.com/visualvm/visualvm/commit/d6026fc5
These options are passed to nbexec,
Hi,
I will try to double-check this, but I'm constantly short on time these
days.
I didn't modify visualvm.conf
But by any means, by looking at the source don't you think it should be -J
rather than -L?
Even if e.g. the bug only appears because Java 9 fails to start with -L,
whereas maybe java 8
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Package: visualvm
> Version: 1.3.9-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> visualvm does not start anymore with the error:
> Unknown option -L-XX:PermSize=32m
> Versions of packages visualvm depends
Hey Erich,
> visualvm: Typos in launcher script - does not start anymore
I can't seem to reproduce this on a fresh stretch or sid chroot. Can you
paste your /etc/visualvm/visualvm.conf? Is this an upgrade? My chroots
seem to be using OpenJDK if that helps.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
Package: visualvm
Version: 1.3.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
visualvm does not start anymore with the error:
Unknown option -L-XX:PermSize=32m
This is caused by a trivial typo in the start script, which supposedly
should use -J (like "Java options") instead of -L
5 matches
Mail list logo
