Hi Ludovic,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ludovic
Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:
I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for the jetty6 package
into jetty, can you have a look at them and release them?
why do we have a new binary package libjetty-extra package now? What
was
Hi Torsten,
libjetty-setuid-java contained both Java and native code, and this
caused problems during the builds as highlighted by Thierry Carrez.
From Thieery Carrez:
Build on i386 succeeded (as it is the one used in the all build) but
amd64 fails (missing servlet and slf4j classes...)
Dear pkg-java members,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 6.1.20-1
of my package jetty.
It builds these binary packages:
jetty - Java servlet engine and webserver
libjetty-extra-java - Java servlet engine and webserver -- extra libraries
libjetty-java - Java servlet engine and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
[1] Three of these are already closed security bugs, which have been
added to this version of the changelog since their CVE ID was missing
in previous releases.
I believe you should edit the previous changelog entries to include those
bug
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
I believe you should edit the previous changelog entries to include those
bug numbers and CVE IDs, so users can easily locate the version that fixed
the bug. (There is nothing wrong with editing old changelog entries to fix
Hello,
There is now lots of confusion around Jetty. I though that we agreed
earlier with Torsten to use the package jetty6 for the new packaging,
and to remove the old jetty package.
So it looks like in the end the jetty package survives...
I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for
6 matches
Mail list logo
