libjfreechart-java_1.0.13-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2012-10-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:24:51 +0200 Source: libjfreechart-java Binary: libjfreechart-java libjfreechart-java-doc libjfreechart-swt-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.13-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer

Bug#654077: marked as done (Updating the libjfreechart-java Uploaders list)

2012-10-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:00:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654077: fixed in libjfreechart-java 1.0.13-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #654077, regarding Updating the libjfreechart-java Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#691063: java-package: generate package needs more provides

2012-10-20 Thread arne anka
Package: java-package Version: 0.50+nmu1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, after generating a java6 package from 6.0.37 (oracle-j2sdk1.6_1.6.0+update37_amd64.deb) I attempted to remove the old sun* packages and the never used and only by force installed openjdk* packages (I don't care if debian

Bug#691063: Acknowledgement (java-package: generate package needs more provides)

2012-10-20 Thread arne anka
well, never mind. didn't realize that ~exp1 means it's in experimental and not yet in sid. but, latexdraw depends on sun-java6-jre which is not in Provides. is sun-java6-jre supposed to go? but as long as a default package like latexdraw (and maybe others) require that, java-package should p

Bug#691063: Acknowledgement (java-package: generate package needs more provides)

2012-10-20 Thread tony mancill
On 10/20/2012 02:26 PM, arne anka wrote: > well, never mind. didn't realize that ~exp1 means it's in experimental > and not yet in sid. > but, latexdraw depends on > > sun-java6-jre > > which is not in Provides. > is sun-java6-jre supposed to go? but as long as a default package like > latexdraw