Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:24:51 +0200
Source: libjfreechart-java
Binary: libjfreechart-java libjfreechart-java-doc libjfreechart-swt-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.13-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer
Your message dated Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:00:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#654077: fixed in libjfreechart-java 1.0.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #654077,
regarding Updating the libjfreechart-java Uploaders list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: java-package
Version: 0.50+nmu1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
after generating a java6 package from 6.0.37
(oracle-j2sdk1.6_1.6.0+update37_amd64.deb) I attempted to remove the old sun*
packages and the never used and only by force installed openjdk*
packages (I don't care if debian
well, never mind. didn't realize that ~exp1 means it's in experimental and
not yet in sid.
but, latexdraw depends on
sun-java6-jre
which is not in Provides.
is sun-java6-jre supposed to go? but as long as a default package like
latexdraw (and maybe others) require that, java-package should p
On 10/20/2012 02:26 PM, arne anka wrote:
> well, never mind. didn't realize that ~exp1 means it's in experimental
> and not yet in sid.
> but, latexdraw depends on
>
> sun-java6-jre
>
> which is not in Provides.
> is sun-java6-jre supposed to go? but as long as a default package like
> latexdraw
5 matches
Mail list logo