Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Am 13.04.2016 um 09:39 schrieb Jan Henke: > Package: java-package > Version: 0.60 > Severity: normal > > Given the following situation. I have openjdk-8-jdk installed from the > archive. For work I need the Oracle JDK, so I download the *.tar.gz and > create a debian package from it with

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Hi, I would prefer this. An extra option while creating the package to give it the highest priority. Markus, while in principle I agree with you, sadly my job requires me to use the propritary JDK. I do think this use case should be as simple as possible and not made more difficult "because

Processed: Re: Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #820857 [java-package] java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 820857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820857 Debian Bug

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Control: severity -1 wishlist Am 13.04.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 13/04/2016 10:04, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I don't think we should change the current behavior and mark this bug as >> wontfix because there will always be people who will argue for or >> against this

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Am 13.04.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Jan Henke: > Hi, > > I would prefer this. An extra option while creating the package to give it > the highest priority. > > Markus, while in principle I agree with you, sadly my job requires me to use > the propritary JDK. I do think this use case should be as

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Jan Henke wrote: > It turns out, the package generated by java-package has a much lower > priority(380) for update-alternatives then then openjdk(~1000) package. > > Please change the java-package tool, so that the generated packages have > the highest priority of all Java

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Package: java-package Version: 0.60 Severity: normal Given the following situation. I have openjdk-8-jdk installed from the archive. For work I need the Oracle JDK, so I download the *.tar.gz and create a debian package from it with java-package. I install the created package, so I have both the

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Le 13/04/2016 10:04, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I don't think we should change the current behavior and mark this bug as > wontfix because there will always be people who will argue for or > against this proposal. We could also add a parameter to change the priority when the package is

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Free Software also means the freedom of choice. Yes, using free software is preferably, but not always we can do that. This package's main purpose is to enable non-free software to integrate as good as possible into Debian. You have to acknowledge there is non-free software in the world and it

Bug#820872: eclipse: Display problem in install window and hereby not possible to install eny items

Package: eclipse Version: 3.8.1-7 Severity: important Hi folks, i have tried everything i can (including starting a completely hardware independent Xserver without my normal (very user defined) grafical env. But there is still this display problem which prevents me from installing items using

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

Hi, Am 13.04.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Jan Henke: > Free Software also means the freedom of choice. Yes, using free software is > preferably, but not always we can do that. This package's main purpose is to > enable non-free software to integrate as good as possible into Debian. You > have to

tiles-autotag_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:01:43 +0200 Source: tiles-autotag Binary: libtiles-autotag-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Processing of entagged_0.35-5_amd64.changes

entagged_0.35-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: entagged_0.35-5.dsc entagged_0.35-5.debian.tar.xz entagged_0.35-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's

Processing of entagged_0.35-5_amd64.changes

entagged_0.35-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: entagged_0.35-5.dsc entagged_0.35-5.debian.tar.xz entagged_0.35-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of

entagged_0.35-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:30:10 +0200 Source: entagged Binary: entagged Architecture: source all Version: 0.35-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

felix-bundlerepository 2.0.8-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the felix-bundlerepository source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.6-1 Current version: 2.0.8-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

Bug#669293: marked as done (entagged: debcheckout fails)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:49:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669293: fixed in entagged 0.35-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #669293, regarding entagged: debcheckout fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#680746: marked as done (entagged: package description review)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:49:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#680746: fixed in entagged 0.35-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #680746, regarding entagged: package description review to be marked as done. This means that you claim

hawtjni 1.11-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the hawtjni source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.10-1 Current version: 1.11-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

Bug#820899: entagged: NullPointerExceptions when clicking on menu items

Package: entagged Version: 0.35-4 Severity: normal When I start entagged from the console I get a NullPointerException Exception in thread "Performer" java.lang.NullPointerException at entagged.tageditor.TagEditorFrame.updatePourcentage(Unknown Source) at

Bug#820942: libpostgresql-jdbc-java: NonValidatingFactory missing from JDBC3 driver

Package: libpostgresql-jdbc-java Version: 9.2-1002-1 Severity: normal Greetings to the Debian Java Developers, I recently upgraded a system from Debian 7.0/Wheezy to 8.0/Jessie. The system hosts an Apache Tomcat instance with a web app (Web ARchive) that talks to a local network PostgreSQL

Bug#820943: libpostgresql-jdbc-java: Please default to JDBC4

Package: libpostgresql-jdbc-java Version: 9.2-1002-1 Severity: wishlist Greetings Debian Java Developers, I recently ran into some trouble with the JDBC3 version of the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver after upgrading from Debian 7 to Debian 8 (bts#820942). My Tomcat instance was configured to use the