Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-17 Thread Allen Hadden
> Thanks for confirming that the last revision is not working as expected. > Now we are back at the beginning. Could you apply this patch [1] and > report back if it resolves your issue please? Yes! That fixed it for us. Sorry again for the run around. Allen __ This is the maintainer address

Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-17 Thread Allen Hadden
First off, thanks for your patience. The thing I was missing was that the build procedure for Debian includes applying patches to the code. I was following the build instructions from the BUILDING.txt file, which doesn't include the Debian-specific instructions. That completely explains what

Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-17 Thread Allen Hadden
> Let's recapitulate: You are currently running +deb7u4 from April 2016 > which is the last good version for you and you see 400 errors when you > use +deb7u5 or any later version up to +deb7u10, correct? Then this is a > different issue because Samuel reported that the 400 errors occurred > when

Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-16 Thread Allen Hadden
The plot thickens! I created a local build from git using the 7.0.28-4+deb7u10 tag. Interestingly when I did that I was unable to reproduce the problem. Originally I suspected that there was something wrong with my build. But after some digging, I'm starting to suspect the official build.

Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-16 Thread Allen Hadden
We are seeing the same thing that Samuel Wolf described, but from our web UI and with 7.0.28-4+deb7u10. We get seemingly random 400 HTTP returns. We downgraded to 7.0.28-4+deb7u4 and that problem went away. Unfortunately in our environment the Tomcat-side Java exception is not being logged,

Bug#854551: 400 errors caused by 7.0.28-4+deb7u10

2017-02-17 Thread Allen Hadden
> That is strange. You have mentioned in your previous email that you > downgraded tomcat7 in Wheezy to version 7.0.28-4+deb7u4. Are you sure > that you are not comparing this version with 7.0.28-4+deb7u10? Why > didn't you downgrade to 7.0.28-4+deb7u9 in the first place? This would > explain the