Bug#448366:

This bug is fixed with current Mercurial tip and will be in the next release. - twisti ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#477317:

Opened a bug in the CACAO bugzilla: http://server.complang.tuwien.ac.at/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 - twisti ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#479529:

Hi! OK, I didn't know these are assembler macros. That is good and even the MIPSpro assembler knows them. But I put the .set mipsX directives into #ifdef's as they are not known by MIPSpro. Here are the changesets: http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/rev/683df1b2eac0

Bug#479529: Upstream fix is partially incorrect

I guess you are talking about this code: http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/file/2effc42cfb01/src/vm/jit/mips/asmpart.S#l426 This code is correct, as the fsX defines use paired registers, starting with a even one. Also see:

Bug#479529: Upstream fix is partially incorrect

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 12:49 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: I leave the Debian bug open for this one. Is there still a problem somewhere? Did I miss something? - twisti ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Bug#479529: Upstream fix is partially incorrect

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:17 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: Christian Thalinger wrote: On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 12:49 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: I leave the Debian bug open for this one. Is there still a problem somewhere? Did I miss something? I believe the SVN commit you pointed