Bug#728375: libjetty8-java-doc: Questionable dependencies

2014-10-09 Thread Jan Henke
Am 09.10.2014 um 09:27 schrieb Mauro Molinari: Il 06/10/2014 12:09, Emmanuel Bourg ha scritto: libjetty8-java-doc already recommends default-jdk-doc, maybe you meant suggested instead? I may have used the wrong terms here, sorry. What I find questionable is that, as I said in my original

Bug#728375: libjetty8-java-doc: Questionable dependencies

2014-10-09 Thread Jan Henke
Am 09.10.2014 um 10:06 schrieb Mauro Molinari: Il 09/10/2014 09:47, Jan Henke ha scritto: Hi, I do think it is reasonable to assume that installing an optional documentation package of one component normally also installs the documentation for other related packages. Especially it does seem

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

2016-04-13 Thread Jan Henke
cause it is non free software". Best Regards, Jan Henke Jan Henke | Softwareentwickler Hugendubel Digital GmbH & Co. KG Friesenweg 1 | D-22763 Hamburg Telefon: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 109 | Telefax: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 113 E-Mail: jhe...@hugendubel-digital.de www.hugendubel.de – Die W

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

2016-04-13 Thread Jan Henke
Package: java-package Version: 0.60 Severity: normal Given the following situation. I have openjdk-8-jdk installed from the archive. For work I need the Oracle JDK, so I download the *.tar.gz and create a debian package from it with java-package. I install the created package, so I have both the

Bug#820857: java-package: Generated JDK package should have higher priority than existing openjdk packages

2016-04-13 Thread Jan Henke
refrain from ideological discussion about free vs non-free software please? Best Regards, Jan Henke Jan Henke | Softwareentwickler Hugendubel Digital GmbH & Co. KG Friesenweg 1 | D-22763 Hamburg Telefon: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 109 | Telefax: +49 (0)40 851 94 - 113 E-Mail: jhe...@hugendubel-digita