Bug#580856: Probably, use libjson-simple-java instead of non-free json?

No, I am not interested in it at all. I was just studying about Debian licenses and those considered non-free and came across this package. I have checked popcon for this package's popularity - seems like nobody needs it. They may go away. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#580856: Probably, use libjson-simple-java instead of non-free json?

Am 28.06.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Jayson Willson: > Hello. What is the situation about this bug now? Seems like jabsorb is > unmaintained since 2012. Probably, it is possible to replace non-free > json with libjson-simple-java implementation, which is in "main"? > Hello, I have downloaded the lates

Bug#580856: Probably, use libjson-simple-java instead of non-free json?

Hello. What is the situation about this bug now? Seems like jabsorb is unmaintained since 2012. Probably, it is possible to replace non-free json with libjson-simple-java implementation, which is in "main"? __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team