Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

2012-06-09 Thread James McCoy
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:08:55PM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: Relevant part: Results : Failed tests: com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.UtilsTest.testBadRegex(): Failed to initialise regexp expression [ [snip] The tests don't appear to fail anymore, but the package then

Processed: Re: Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

2012-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 654002 + pending Bug #654002 [checkstyle] Updating the checkstyle Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. tags 652232 + pending Bug #652232 [src:checkstyle] checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 Added tag(s)

Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

2012-06-09 Thread Miguel Landaeta
tags 654002 + pending tags 652232 + pending thanks On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:51:44PM -0400, James McCoy wrote: The tests don't appear to fail anymore, but the package then fails to build because it can't find checkstyle.jar. This looks like it's due to changes in some of the helper tools

Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

2011-12-15 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Source: checkstyle Version: 5.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111210 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: Results : Failed