Your message dated Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:58:33 +0000
with message-id <e1esomp-000hro...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#874129: fixed in uddi4j 2.0.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #874129,
regarding FTBFS with Java 9: java.xml
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
874129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: uddi4j
Version: 2.0.5
Severity: normal
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java9

This package fails to build with default-jdk pointing to openjdk-9-jdk.
The wiki has some common problems and their solutions:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Java9Pitfalls

java.xml seems to be at fault. See the wiki.

Build log:

   [javac]   class file for javax.xml.soap.Name not found
    [javac] 
/build/uddi4j-2.0.5/src/org/uddi4j/transport/ApacheAxisTransport.java:100: 
error: cannot access SOAPBodyElement
    [javac]             base = stringToElement(((SOAPBodyElement) 
result.elementAt(0)).toString());
    [javac]                                                                     
      ^
    [javac]   class file for javax.xml.soap.SOAPBodyElement not found
    [javac] 
/build/uddi4j-2.0.5/src/org/uddi4j/transport/ApacheAxisTransport.java:104: 
error: cannot access SOAPMessage
    [javac]                 base = 
stringToElement(m.getSOAPEnvelope().getFirstBody().toString());
    [javac]                                         ^
    [javac]   class file for javax.xml.soap.SOAPMessage not found
    [javac] 
/build/uddi4j-2.0.5/src/org/uddi4j/transport/ApacheAxisTransport.java:104: 
error: cannot access SOAPEnvelope
    [javac]                 base = 
stringToElement(m.getSOAPEnvelope().getFirstBody().toString());
    [javac]                                                           ^



Cheers,
Chris.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: uddi4j
Source-Version: 2.0.5-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
uddi4j, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 874...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org> (supplier of updated uddi4j package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:31:55 +0100
Source: uddi4j
Binary: libuddi4j-java libuddi4j-java-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
<pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Markus Koschany <a...@debian.org>
Description:
 libuddi4j-java - UDDI implementation in Java
 libuddi4j-java-doc - Documentation for libuddi4j-java
Closes: 874129
Changes:
 uddi4j (2.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * Switch to compat level 10.
   * wrap-and-sort -sa.
   * Use canonical VCS address.
   * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.2.
   * Use copyright format 1.0.
   * Switch from cdbs to dh sequencer.
   * d/control: Remove duplicate Section:java.
   * Add java9.patch and fix FTBFS with Java 9.
     Thanks to Chris West for the report. (Closes: #874129)
   * Compile with openjdk-9-jdk because the --add-modules flag is not valid in
     OpenJDK 8. (A conditional fix would be nice)
   * Update build.xml-encoding.patch and fix the javadoc encoding.
Checksums-Sha1:
 92fc0fa5dd6aa0f6e40ff8f8e602cdf469d2775e 2167 uddi4j_2.0.5-3.dsc
 9a41c209d584089fd9459ebaa4d5a800922f8d33 7004 uddi4j_2.0.5-3.debian.tar.xz
 f12b86845ab02d9900f919fdcc717a573652df23 11970 uddi4j_2.0.5-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 de552fe5aedaa013c10223daaac046ce2c69776200e339015d05869ec23c8da3 2167 
uddi4j_2.0.5-3.dsc
 805e439217cbb569c430def1308bf3d4177be7ee9165b92b38031f840f705e45 7004 
uddi4j_2.0.5-3.debian.tar.xz
 6e0be02eab56967be097d9e4e06be342a19099e6d55836bd17334644d4fe15cb 11970 
uddi4j_2.0.5-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 fffc68fca29869b362f64ae8d64459ff 2167 java optional uddi4j_2.0.5-3.dsc
 5cb4c391da050222184b07f166283ca2 7004 java optional 
uddi4j_2.0.5-3.debian.tar.xz
 73f751cfa496cfe49f6536fbab3ccad9 11970 java optional 
uddi4j_2.0.5-3_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RGh8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. 
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to