Re: pirl_2.3.4.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-04-18 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Luca, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org wrote: several files are licensed under LGPL-2.1. Please fix your copyright file. The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2. Anyway

Re: pirl_2.3.4.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-04-18 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 18 aprile 2012 09:00, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com ha scritto: The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2. It's advisable to put this kind of information directly in the copyright file, as it's