Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:06:06 +0100
Source: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs
Binary: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs
Architecture: source
Version: 9.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2.dsc
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 63109,
but node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0.orig.tar.gz has 63063.
If you did not include
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2.dsc
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
node-rollup-plugin-commonjs_9.2.0-2_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Source: json-editor.js
Severity: wishlist
The latest version of this library/tool is 1.2. Please can we package for the
latest version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture:
Hi,
> I don't see such a line here.
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/npm/blob/master/lib/utils/completion.sh
>
> May be that came from an older version? Can you purge npm, reinstall and
> confirm
> if you still see it?
I just extracted the package and to my surprise found the file somewhere
Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2018 15:04:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#892227: fixed in backbone 1.3.3~dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #892227,
regarding node-backbone: dependencies fail to resolve when jQuery not installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 15:12:24 +0100
Source: backbone
Binary: libjs-backbone node-backbone
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.3~dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 10:33:48 +0100 Ralf Jung wrote:
>
> COMP_WORDBREAKS=${COMP_WORDBREAKS/=/}
>
> Please remove that line, or otherwise stop breaking unrelated packages.
>
I don't see such a line here.
https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/npm/blob/master/lib/utils/completion.sh
May be that came
node-lunr_2.3.5~dfsg-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-lunr_2.3.5~dfsg-6.dsc
node-lunr_2.3.5~dfsg-6.debian.tar.xz
node-lunr_2.3.5~dfsg-6_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -ftbfs
Bug #899266 [src:backbone] [node-backbone] FTBFS documentation
Removed tag(s) ftbfs.
> retitle -1 backbone: documentation is pre-generated
Bug #899266 [src:backbone] [node-backbone] FTBFS documentation
Changed Bug title to 'backbone: documentation is
Control: tags -1 -ftbfs
Control: retitle -1 backbone: documentation is pre-generated
Control: severity -1 normal
Quoting Bastien ROUCARIÈS (2018-05-21 23:37:19)
> docs/*.html are build with docco not packaged for debian
Correct: The documentation files below docs/ in upstream source was
uglifyjs_2.8.29-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
uglifyjs_2.8.29-4.dsc
uglifyjs_2.8.29-4.debian.tar.xz
uglifyjs_2.8.29-4_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing
Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2018 11:20:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917746: fixed in uglifyjs 2.8.29-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #917746,
regarding uglifyjs: FTBFS: tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2018 11:20:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#847642: fixed in uglifyjs 2.8.29-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #847642,
regarding node-uglify: neither manpage nor --help output useful
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On 2018, ഡിസംബർ 30 1:32:47 PM IST, Xavier wrote:
>Hello,
>
>node-redis seems also out-of-date. Would you accept co-maintenance on
>this package ?
>
It is already listed as team maintained. I don't think we need to ask every
uploader separately.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.
On 2018, ഡിസംബർ 30 1:56:54 PM IST, Xavier wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>while buster freeze comes,
>https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?pkg-javascript-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
>shows that:
> - more than 60 RC bugs have to be fixed
> - the majority of our packages are outdated or obsolete
>
>I think we
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 09:40:19 +0100
Source: node-v8flags
Binary: node-v8flags
Architecture: source
Version: 3.1.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers
Changed-By: Bastien
node-v8flags_3.1.2-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
node-v8flags_3.1.2-3.dsc
node-v8flags_3.1.2-3.debian.tar.xz
node-v8flags_3.1.2-3_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
Hi all,
while buster freeze comes,
https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?pkg-javascript-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
shows that:
- more than 60 RC bugs have to be fixed
- the majority of our packages are outdated or obsolete
I think we should - at least until buster freeze - have a "salvage" policy.
Hello,
node-redis seems also out-of-date. Would you accept co-maintenance on
this package ?
Cheers,
Xavier
Le 29/12/2018 à 23:40, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-redis
> Version: 0.12.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: buster sid
> Usertags: ftbfs-20181229
21 matches
Mail list logo
