On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:23:58AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-02-15 08:17:52)
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:32:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > (I used to maintain emscripten, but have been laid off from the job
> > > sponsoring my work on that)
> >
> >
Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-02-15 08:17:52)
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:32:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > (I used to maintain emscripten, but have been laid off from the job
> > sponsoring my work on that)
>
> I'm really sorry to hear that - I do hope you find another job soon
> (or
Dear Jonas,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:32:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-02-14 23:24:08)
> > I've just submitted node-webfont to ci.debian.net and had failures on
> > three architectures.
> [...]
> > My guess is that s390x can't handle wasm, or something like
Quoting Julian Gilbey (2023-02-14 23:24:08)
> I've just submitted node-webfont to ci.debian.net and had failures on
> three architectures.
[...]
> My guess is that s390x can't handle wasm, or something like that, but
> if that's not the issue, then I have no idea. This code is generated
> by
I've just submitted node-webfont to ci.debian.net and had failures on
three architectures. One (armel) appears to be just timeouts, so
that's easy to handle. But it's also failing on ppc64el and s390x,
and there I'm stuck.
(https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/node-webfont/)
On s390x, it's
